These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23773869)

  • 1. Computed tomography perfusion to assess physiological significance of coronary stenosis in the post-FAME era (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).
    Arai AE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1486-7. PubMed ID: 23773869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
    Rief M; Zimmermann E; Stenzel F; Martus P; Stangl K; Greupner J; Knebel F; Kranz A; Schlattmann P; Laule M; Dewey M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(16):1476-85. PubMed ID: 23792193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
    Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
    Kim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Tremmel JA; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1037-42. PubMed ID: 23078733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractional flow reserve-guided coronary artery bypass grafting: can intraoperative physiologic imaging guide decision making?
    Ferguson TB; Chen C; Babb JD; Efird JT; Daggubati R; Cahill JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 146(4):824-835.e1. PubMed ID: 23915918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements.
    Ben Bouallègue F; Roubille F; Lattuca B; Cung TT; Macia JC; Gervasoni R; Leclercq F; Mariano-Goulart D
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1712-7. PubMed ID: 26338893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
    van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
    Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.
    Fearon WF; Bornschein B; Tonino PA; Gothe RM; Bruyne BD; Pijls NH; Siebert U;
    Circulation; 2010 Dec; 122(24):2545-50. PubMed ID: 21126973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Sels JW; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Fearon WF; Van't Veer M; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1183-9. PubMed ID: 22115657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of unprotected left main coronary artery stenting.
    Nageh T; Thomas MR; Wainwright RJ
    Circulation; 2002 Apr; 105(14):e85. PubMed ID: 11940562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From SYNTAX to FAME, a paradigm shift in revascularization strategies: the key role of fractional flow reserve in guiding myocardial revascularization.
    Mangiacapra F; Barbato E
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Aug; 12(8):538-42. PubMed ID: 21670702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasonography to evaluate ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Arora H; Posligua W; Mesa A
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2008; 35(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 18941601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Melikian N; De Bondt P; Tonino P; De Winter O; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Fearon WF; Pijls NH; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 3(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20298990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Coronary artery disease diagnostic with fractional flow reserve].
    Trana C; Muller O; Eeckhout E
    Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Jun; 7(297):1182-8. PubMed ID: 21717690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.