266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377402)
1. The Georgia Court Competency Test: the base-rate problem.
Wildman RW; White PA; Brandenburg CE
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1055-8. PubMed ID: 2377402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In defense of the insanity defense.
Beigel H
Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1983; 5(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 6662497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics and expert witnesses: the troubled role of psychiatrists in court.
Clements CD; Ciccone JR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 6743845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14 Suppl 1():S12-8. PubMed ID: 16575810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Forensic psychiatric assessment in the USSR].
Friemert K
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 3237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to law relevant to mentally disordered offenders.
Dolan B
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2004; 14(2 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 23570119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Center for forensic psychiatry evaluation unit services.
Jackson NL
New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1996; (69):81-8. PubMed ID: 8935827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A paradoxical outcome of a regional review board decision: a case report.
Cashman FE
Can J Psychiatry; 1988 Nov; 33(8):778. PubMed ID: 3203282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further comments on the insanity defense in the aftermath of the Hinckley trial.
Halpern AL
Psychiatr Q; 1984; 56(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 6522530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Guilty but mentally ill--in search of a perspective.
Ermutlu IM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 May; 72(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 6864120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ALI test for insanity: a re-examination.
Miller GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 6850104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.
McGrath JJ
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic psychiatry: critique of a critique.
Zonana HV
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 6478066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Forensic psychiatry in The Netherlands: positioning and functioning of Dutch forensic psychiatrists.
Schnitzler JG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):443-55. PubMed ID: 6679534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Modification of criminal law and its impact on psychiatric expert opinions.
Hollweg M
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 9526720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic treatment in the United States: a survey of selected forensic hospitals. Treatment at Michigan's Forensic Center.
Clark CR; Holden CE; Thompson JS; Watson PL; Wightman LH
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1993; 16(1-2):71-81. PubMed ID: 8500970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychiatric assessment at the magistrates' court. Early intervention is needed in the remand process.
Joseph PL
Br J Psychiatry; 1994 Jun; 164(6):722-4. PubMed ID: 7952977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
