These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies. Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of form across saccadic eye movements. Hayhoe M; Lachter J; Feldman J Perception; 1991; 20(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 1762882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawing attention at little or no cost: detection and discrimination tasks. Braun J; Julesz B Percept Psychophys; 1998 Jan; 60(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 9503909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Briand KA; Klein RM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms. Dick AO J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 5083131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of peripheral visual images in a laterally restricted gaze field. Semmlow JL; Gauthier GM; Vercher JL Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 2326117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 8473843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields. Lévy-Schoen A; Coëffé C; Jacobs AM Brain Behav Evol; 1989; 33(2-3):80-4. PubMed ID: 2758306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Orientational interactions between stationary and moving gratings]. Gorea A; Fiorentini A Annee Psychol; 1982; 82(1):45-65. PubMed ID: 7149674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Interaction effects in the lateral visual field: an extension of Bouma's (1970) approach]. Heller D; Huckauf A; Nazir T Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(3):386-418. PubMed ID: 8640479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Spatial attention: objections to the spotlight model of visual selectivity]. Buchner A Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1988; 35(4):523-45. PubMed ID: 3218272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Texture-based tasks are little affected by second tasks requiring peripheral or central attentive fixation. Braun J; Sagi D Perception; 1991; 20(4):483-500. PubMed ID: 1771133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of feature uncertainty on spatial discriminations. Vogels R; Eeckhout H; Orban GA Perception; 1988; 17(5):565-77. PubMed ID: 3249664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulation of backward pattern masking by focal visual attention. Vidnyánszky Z Acta Biol Hung; 2002; 53(1-2):221-7. PubMed ID: 12064773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. Henderson JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 8666963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual detection and perceptual independence: assessing color and form. Cohen DJ Percept Psychophys; 1997 May; 59(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 9158336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]