These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23774921)

  • 41. Motives for - and prevalence of - cesarean delivery on maternal request: A survey in Saudi Arabia.
    Ahmed AE; Mohammad RS
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(1):2. PubMed ID: 31384571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A case-control study of caesarean delivery on maternal request: who and why?
    Lerner-Geva L; Glasser S; Levitan G; Boyko V; Golan A; Beloosesky R; Lunenfeld E; Many A; Samueloff A; Schiff E; Shoham A; Fisher M; Hirsh-Yechezkel G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(17):2780-5. PubMed ID: 26526785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries].
    Onsrud L; Onsrud M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Jan; 116(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8553342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Requests for cesarean deliveries: The politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China.
    Wang E
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Jan; 173():1-8. PubMed ID: 27914313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of previous cesarean deliveries on severe maternal and adverse perinatal outcomes at a university hospital in Tanzania.
    Litorp H; Rööst M; Kidanto HL; Nyström L; Essén B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 26868073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women.
    Thorsell M; Lyrenäs S; Andolf E; Kaijser M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Oct; 90(10):1094-9. PubMed ID: 21679162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
    Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
    Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An analysis of the indications for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in China.
    Gao Y; Xue Q; Chen G; Stone P; Zhao M; Chen Q
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):414-8. PubMed ID: 23978503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: a systematic review and meta-regression.
    Begum T; Saif-Ur-Rahman KM; Yaqoot F; Stekelenburg J; Anuradha S; Biswas T; Doi SA; Mamun AA
    BJOG; 2021 Apr; 128(5):798-806. PubMed ID: 32929868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do cesarean deliveries on maternal request lead to greater maternal care utilization during six-month, one-year, and two-year postpartum periods? Evidence from NHI claims data in Taiwan.
    Liu TC; Loh CP; Lin CL; Chen CS
    Health Policy; 2014 Jul; 117(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 24268053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8. PubMed ID: 28153656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.
    Tamim H; El-Chemaly SY; Nassar AH; Aaraj AM; Campbell OM; Kaddour AA; Yunis KA;
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 17324173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.
    Chung WH; Kong CW; To WW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 28684651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Primary cesarean section and adverse delivery outcomes among women of very advanced maternal age.
    Richards MK; Flanagan MR; Littman AJ; Burke AK; Callegari LS
    J Perinatol; 2016 Apr; 36(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 26741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Maternal attitudes in prepared and unprepared cesarean deliveries.
    Hart G
    JOGN Nurs; 1980; 9(4):243-5. PubMed ID: 6903636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A low fetal cerebroplacental ratio confers a greater risk of intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcomes in low risk multiparous women at term.
    Turner JM; Flatley C; Kumar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():15-21. PubMed ID: 30237135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study.
    Vézina Y; Bujold E; Varin J; Marquette GP; Boucher M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):763-8. PubMed ID: 15042011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Murthy K; Grobman WA; Lee TA; Holl JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1264-9. PubMed ID: 18055719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.