These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23775627)

  • 1. Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.
    Vajda S; Hall DR; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2013 Nov; 81(11):1874-84. PubMed ID: 23775627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid Design of Knowledge-Based Scoring Potentials for Enrichment of Near-Native Geometries in Protein-Protein Docking.
    Sasse A; de Vries SJ; Schindler CE; de Beauchêne IC; Zacharias M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170625. PubMed ID: 28118389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys.
    Liang S; Meroueh SO; Wang G; Qiu C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 18831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting near-native docking decoys by Monte Carlo stability analysis.
    Lorenzen S
    Genome Inform; 2007; 18():206-14. PubMed ID: 18546488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A filter enhanced sampling and combinatorial scoring study for protein docking in CAPRI.
    Gong XQ; Chang S; Zhang QH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Ma XH; Wang MH; Liu B; He HQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 17803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the multi-objective optimization replica exchange Monte Carlo enhanced sampling method for protein-small molecule docking.
    Wang H; Liu H; Cai L; Wang C; Lv Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):327. PubMed ID: 28693470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations.
    Lorenzen S; Zhang Y
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 17397057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo replica-exchange based ensemble docking of protein conformations.
    Zhang Z; Ehmann U; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2017 May; 85(5):924-937. PubMed ID: 28168752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?
    Feliu E; Oliva B
    Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3376-85. PubMed ID: 20848549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Docking with PIPER and refinement with SDU in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI.
    Shen Y; Brenke R; Kozakov D; Comeau SR; Beglov D; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):734-42. PubMed ID: 17853451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein-protein docking with binding site patch prediction and network-based terms enhanced combinatorial scoring.
    Gong X; Wang P; Yang F; Chang S; Liu B; He H; Cao L; Xu X; Li C; Chen W; Wang C
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3150-5. PubMed ID: 20806233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
    Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normalizing molecular docking rankings using virtually generated decoys.
    Wallach I; Jaitly N; Nguyen K; Schapira M; Lilien R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1817-30. PubMed ID: 21699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein docking by Rotation-Based Uniform Sampling (RotBUS) with fast computing of intermolecular contact distance and residue desolvation.
    Solernou A; Fernandez-Recio J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 11():352. PubMed ID: 20584304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?
    Korb O; Ten Brink T; Victor Paul Raj FR; Keil M; Exner TE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Feb; 26(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 22231069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition.
    Lensink MF; Méndez R; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17918726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling and Scoring in Protein-Protein Docking.
    Zięba A; Matosiuk D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2780():15-26. PubMed ID: 38987461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.