These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23775882)

  • 1. Next steps in the development of ecological soil clean-up values for metals.
    Wentsel R; Fairbrother A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 23775882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations to improve wildlife exposure estimation for development of soil screening and cleanup values.
    Sample BE; Schlekat C; Spurgeon DJ; Menzie C; Rauscher J; Adams B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):372-87. PubMed ID: 24039164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Furthering the derivation of predictive wildlife toxicity reference values for use in soil cleanup decisions.
    Mayfield DB; Johnson MS; Burris JA; Fairbrother A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):358-71. PubMed ID: 23913912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulatory considerations for the potential development and application of metal cleanup values.
    Greenberg MS; Schoeters I; Wentsel RS; Charters DW; Mitchell IA; Zajdlik B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 23966203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deriving site-specific clean-up criteria to protect ecological receptors (plants and soil invertebrates) exposed to metal or metalloid soil contaminants via the direct contact exposure pathway.
    Checkai R; Van Genderen E; Sousa JP; Stephenson G; Smolders E
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 24470189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deriving site-specific soil clean-up values for metals and metalloids: rationale for including protection of soil microbial processes.
    Kuperman RG; Siciliano SD; Römbke J; Oorts K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jul; 10(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 24376192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying correlations of metal ionic characters with ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSLs) of metals using QICAR models.
    Meng X; Wang X; Wang Y
    Chemosphere; 2019 Aug; 228():451-459. PubMed ID: 31051347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of metals bioavailability and speciation information for ecological risk assessment in arid soils.
    Suedel BC; Nicholson A; Day CH; Spicer J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Oct; 2(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 17069177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of ecological soil-screening levels for metals to exposure model parameterization and toxicity reference values.
    Sample BE; Fairbrother A; Kaiser A; Law S; Adams B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Oct; 33(10):2386-98. PubMed ID: 24944000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools.
    Fernández MD; Vega MM; Tarazona JV
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):466-84. PubMed ID: 16574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efforts to standardize wildlife toxicity values remain unrealized.
    Mayfield DB; Fairbrother A
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 22915290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.
    Bradham K; Wentsel R
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 20077282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Some thoughts of the comparison of risk based soil environmental standards between different countries].
    Zhang HZ; Luo YM; Xia JQ; Zhang HB
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 32(3):795-802. PubMed ID: 21634180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soil criteria to protect terrestrial wildlife and open-range livestock from metal toxicity at mining sites.
    Ford KL; Beyer WN
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Mar; 186(3):1899-905. PubMed ID: 24310366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxicity testing of heavy-metal-polluted soils with algae Selenastrum capricornutum: a soil suspension assay.
    Aruoja V; Kurvet I; Dubourguier HC; Kahru A
    Environ Toxicol; 2004 Aug; 19(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 15269912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ecological risk assessment of contaminated soils through direct toxicity assessment.
    Fernández MD; Cagigal E; Vega MM; Urzelai A; Babín M; Pro J; Tarazona JV
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2005 Oct; 62(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 16112018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring metals in terrestrial environments within a bioavailability framework and a focus on soil extraction.
    Peijnenburg WJ; Zablotskaja M; Vijver MG
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Jun; 67(2):163-79. PubMed ID: 17445889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of biological and chemical measures of metal bioavailability in field soils: test of a novel simulated earthworm gut extraction.
    Smith BA; Greenberg B; Stephenson GL
    Chemosphere; 2010 Oct; 81(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 20678790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.