217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23776247)
1. Primary endosymbiosis events date to the later Proterozoic with cross-calibrated phylogenetic dating of duplicated ATPase proteins.
Shih PM; Matzke NJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jul; 110(30):12355-60. PubMed ID: 23776247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative Time Constraints Improve Molecular Dating.
Szöllõsi GJ; Höhna S; Williams TA; Schrempf D; Daubin V; Boussau B
Syst Biol; 2022 Jun; 71(4):797-809. PubMed ID: 34668564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration choice, rate smoothing, and the pattern of tetrapod diversification according to the long nuclear gene RAG-1.
Hugall AF; Foster R; Lee MS
Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):543-63. PubMed ID: 17654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae).
Near TJ; Bolnick DI; Wainwright PC
Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1768-82. PubMed ID: 16329246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of fossil tip-dating versus node-age calibrations in tetraodontiform fishes (Teleostei: Percomorphaceae).
Arcila D; Alexander Pyron R; Tyler JC; Ortí G; Betancur-R R
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Jan; 82 Pt A():131-45. PubMed ID: 25462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical calibrated radiocarbon sampler: a tool for incorporating radiocarbon-date and calibration error into Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of ancient DNA.
Molak M; Suchard MA; Ho SY; Beilman DW; Shapiro B
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jan; 15(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24964386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes.
Yoon HS; Hackett JD; Ciniglia C; Pinto G; Bhattacharya D
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):809-18. PubMed ID: 14963099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of molecular-clock calibrations and substitution rates in liverworts, mosses, and hornworts, and a timeframe for a taxonomically cleaned-up genus Nothoceros.
Villarreal JC; Renner SS
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():25-35. PubMed ID: 24792087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular fossil gap.
Puttick MN; Thomas GH; Benton MJ
Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):873-86. PubMed ID: 26990798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating the Divergence Times of Alphaproteobacteria Based on Mitochondrial Endosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Fossils.
Wang S; Luo H
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2569():95-116. PubMed ID: 36083445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian relaxed clock estimation of divergence times in foraminifera.
Groussin M; Pawlowski J; Yang Z
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 21723398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are pollen fossils useful for calibrating relaxed molecular clock dating of phylogenies? A comparative study using Myrtaceae.
Thornhill AH; Popple LW; Carter RJ; Ho SY; Crisp MD
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 22197806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating molecular clock calibrations using Bayesian analyses with soft and hard bounds.
Sanders KL; Lee MS
Biol Lett; 2007 Jun; 3(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 17363358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Fossil Calibration Database-A New Resource for Divergence Dating.
Ksepka DT; Parham JF; Allman JF; Benton MJ; Carrano MT; Cranston KA; Donoghue PC; Head JJ; Hermsen EJ; Irmis RB; Joyce WG; Kohli M; Lamm KD; Leehr D; Patané JL; Polly PD; Phillips MJ; Smith NA; Smith ND; Van Tuinen M; Ware JL; Warnock RC
Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):853-9. PubMed ID: 25922515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales).
Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F
Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times.
Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using more than the oldest fossils: dating osmundaceae with three Bayesian clock approaches.
Grimm GW; Kapli P; Bomfleur B; McLoughlin S; Renner SS
Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 25503771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibrating the Tree of Life: fossils, molecules and evolutionary timescales.
Forest F
Ann Bot; 2009 Oct; 104(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 19666901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
