These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23776257)

  • 1. Accuracy of genomic prediction using an evenly spaced, low-density single nucleotide polymorphism panel in broiler chickens.
    Wang C; Habier D; Peiris BL; Wolc A; Kranis A; Watson KA; Avendano S; Garrick DJ; Fernando RL; Lamont SJ; Dekkers JC
    Poult Sci; 2013 Jul; 92(7):1712-23. PubMed ID: 23776257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interest of using imputation for genomic evaluation in layer chicken.
    Herry F; Druet DP; Hérault F; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    Poult Sci; 2020 May; 99(5):2324-2336. PubMed ID: 32359567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
    Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Fix J; Steibel JP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 24531728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individuals.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP
    BMC Proc; 2011 May; 5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. PubMed ID: 21624176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technologies as an alternative to low-density SNP chips for genomic selection: a simulation study in layer chickens.
    Herry F; Hérault F; Lecerf F; Lagoutte L; Doublet M; Picard-Druet D; Bardou P; Varenne A; Burlot T; Le Roy P; Allais S
    BMC Genomics; 2023 May; 24(1):271. PubMed ID: 37208589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits of beef cattle using 50K and imputed HD genotypes.
    Lu D; Akanno EC; Crowley JJ; Schenkel F; Li H; De Pauw M; Moore SS; Wang Z; Li C; Stothard P; Plastow G; Miller SP; Basarab JA
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1342-53. PubMed ID: 27135994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):343-53. PubMed ID: 19299339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jun; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 21693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.
    Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short communication: Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction of body conformation traits in Chinese Holsteins using markers derived from high-density marker panels.
    Song H; Li L; Ma P; Zhang S; Su G; Lund MS; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5250-5254. PubMed ID: 29550139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.