These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377722)
1. VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction-time distribution. Jaśkowski P; Pruszewicz A; Swidzinski P Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 2377722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time effects on event-related brain potentials and vigilance performance. Koelega HS; Verbaten MN; van Leeuwen TH; Kenemans JL; Kemner C; Sjouw W Biol Psychol; 1992 Oct; 34(1):59-86. PubMed ID: 1420655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual response latencies in temporal lobe structures as a function of stimulus information load. Coburn KL; Ashford JW; Fuster JM Behav Neurosci; 1990 Feb; 104(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 2317287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. VEP and ERP abnormalities in children and adolescents with prepubertal onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Uberall MA; Renner C; Edl S; Parzinger E; Wenzel D Neuropediatrics; 1996 Apr; 27(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 8737824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Changes in spontaneous slow potentials and visually (flash) evoked potentials in response to stimuli with no performance implication]. Sammer G Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(2):299-316. PubMed ID: 1413922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies. Smulders FT; Kok A; Kenemans JL; Bashore TR Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):97-109. PubMed ID: 8525879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of flash mode and intensity on P2 component latency and amplitude. Coburn KL; Amoss RT; Arruda JE; Kizer LD; Marshall YS Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Mar; 55(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15708645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity. Jaskowski P; Rybarczyk K; Jaroszyk F Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 8153244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Henson RN; Rylands A; Ross E; Vuilleumeir P; Rugg MD Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1674-89. PubMed ID: 15050590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. P300 evoked by an auditory and a visual paradigm and a semantic task. Dierks T; Maurer K Psychiatry Res; 1989 Sep; 29(3):439-41. PubMed ID: 2608814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Covariability of visually evoked potentials and simple motor reaction times. Hartwell RC; Cowan JD Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 92(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 7527766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Hackley SA; Valle-Inclán F Biol Psychol; 2003 Oct; 64(1-2):27-45. PubMed ID: 14602354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing of multi-dimensional stimuli: P300 component of the event-related brain potential during mental comparison of compound digits. Ullsperger P; Grune K Biol Psychol; 1995 May; 40(1-2):17-31. PubMed ID: 7647179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulus probability and motor response in young and old adults: an ERP study. Looren de Jong H; Kok A; Van Rooy JC Biol Psychol; 1989 Oct; 29(2):125-48. PubMed ID: 2627560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]