These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377723)
21. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment. Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference. Hellström A Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Space is to time as vision is to audition: seductive but misleading. Handel S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):315-7. PubMed ID: 2967884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task. Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task. Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination. Fujisaki W; Nishida S Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Audiovisual temporal order judgments. Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C Exp Brain Res; 2003 Sep; 152(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 12879178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities. Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination. Meck WH Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 423():528-41. PubMed ID: 6588813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of synchronous audiovisual distractors on audiovisual temporal order judgments. Vatakis A; Bayliss L; Zampini M; Spence C Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):298-309. PubMed ID: 17557599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one. Woods DL; Alain C; Ogawa KH Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9529908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences. Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect. Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement. Tiippana K; Salmela VR Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 29484457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Superior Visual Timing Sensitivity in Auditory But Not Visual World Class Drum Corps Experts. Matthews N; Welch L; Festa E eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Good vibrations: human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality. Jones LA; Poliakoff E; Wells J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2171-86. PubMed ID: 19370453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. Di Luca M; Machulla TK; Ernst MO J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):7.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction. Indraccolo A; Spence C; Vatakis A; Harrar V Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 25869739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction. Rammsayer TH; Verner M J Vis; 2014 May; 14(5):17. PubMed ID: 24879864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]