77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377732)
1. Nurse "log rolls" solo: adverse effects. Case in point: Routh v. St. John's Mercy Med. Center (785 S.W. 2d 744--MO (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jul; 31(2):4. PubMed ID: 2377732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse contracts hepatitis-B: "dual capacity" issue. Case in point: Gatlin v. Truman Medical Center (770 S.W. 2d 510--MO (1989)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Aug; 30(3):4. PubMed ID: 2772219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pt. slips & breaks hip on "leakage": expert testimony. Case in point: McMillan v. King (577 So. 2d 519-MS (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 May; 30(12):2. PubMed ID: 2356315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure to follow doctors' orders and documentation. Case in point: Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center (709 S.W.2d 872 - MO.).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):4. PubMed ID: 3638743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Did hosp. violate FMLA: is RN guilty of job abandonment? Case on point: Stekloff v. St. John's Mercy Health Systems, 2000 WL 959613 F.3d-MO (2000).
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Jul; 41(2):2. PubMed ID: 11995107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Injection technique: R.N. expert opinion. Case in point: Tripp v. Humana, Inc. (474 So. 2d 88 - AL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):2. PubMed ID: 3852349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemoclips left in patient: nurse's notes ignored. Case in point: St. Francis Reg. Med. Ctr. V. Hale (752 P. 2d 129--KS (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jun; 29(1):4. PubMed ID: 3260679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):4. PubMed ID: 3423266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse refuses to "stay out of it": termination. Case in point: Kirk v. Mercy Hosp. Tri-County 851 S.W. 2d 617--MO (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Jul; 34(2):2. PubMed ID: 8362066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurse temporarily in ICU increases dosage without authorization. Woodward v. Research Medical Center, 2005 WL 2007878 S.W.3d -MO.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Oct; 46(5):4. PubMed ID: 16312115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The nurse as an expert witness.
Creighton H
Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):22-3. PubMed ID: 3399203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When R.N.'s fail to communicate: disaster. Case in point: Lambert v. Sisters of Mercy Health Corp. (369 N.W. 2d 417-IA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Aug; 26(3):2. PubMed ID: 3850612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supervisors: how to handle insubordination. Case in point: L.S.U. Med. Center v. Boyd (432 So. 2d 330 - La).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1983 Oct; 24(5):4. PubMed ID: 6557592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Must nurse expert have recent hands-on experience? Case on point: Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin, 1D10-859 (7/16/2010)-FL.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):4. PubMed ID: 20954519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fingerprint scanners help improve record security.
ED Manag; 2006 Jun; 18(6):64-5. PubMed ID: 16800317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
