These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23777994)

  • 1. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department.
    Fernandes CM; McLeod S; Krause J; Shah A; Jewell J; Smith B; Rollins L
    CJEM; 2013 Jul; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 23777994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prehospital Application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale by Emergency Medical Services.
    Leeies M; Ffrench C; Strome T; Weldon E; Bullard M; Grierson R
    CJEM; 2017 Jan; 19(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 27508353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores?
    Dallaire C; Poitras J; Aubin K; Lavoie A; Moore L
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 42(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 22209550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement among pediatric health care professionals with the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale guidelines.
    Bergeron S; Gouin S; Bailey B; Amre DK; Patel H
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2004 Aug; 20(8):514-8. PubMed ID: 15295246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interrater agreement of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses.
    Dallaire C; Poitras J; Aubin K; Lavoie A; Moore L; Audet G
    CJEM; 2010 Jan; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20078918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia.
    Alquraini M; Awad E; Hijazi R
    Int J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 8(1):80. PubMed ID: 26251308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater Reliability, Accuracy, and Triage Time Pre- and Post-implementation of a Real-Time Electronic Triage Decision-Support Tool.
    McLeod SL; McCarron J; Ahmed T; Grewal K; Mittmann N; Scott S; Ovens H; Garay J; Bullard M; Rowe BH; Dreyer J; Borgundvaag B
    Ann Emerg Med; 2020 Apr; 75(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 31564379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage.
    Göransson K; Ehrenberg A; Marklund B; Ehnfors M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Dec; 19(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 16324070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the Canadian triage and acuity scale.
    Alshaibi S; AlBassri T; AlQeuflie S; Philip W; Alharthy N
    BMC Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 21(1):146. PubMed ID: 34809562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016.
    Bullard MJ; Musgrave E; Warren D; Unger B; Skeldon T; Grierson R; van der Linde E; Swain J
    CJEM; 2017 Jul; 19(S2):S18-S27. PubMed ID: 28756800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement.
    Beveridge R; Ducharme J; Janes L; Beaulieu S; Walter S
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Aug; 34(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 10424915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Akhmetshin E; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 14(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 17200513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing the Usability of the 5-Level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale By Paramedics in the Prehospital Environment.
    Smith DT; Snyder A; Hollen PJ; Anderson JG; Caterino JM
    J Emerg Nurs; 2015 Nov; 41(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 26001701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of admission to hospital of patients triaged as nonurgent using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Lin D; Worster A
    CJEM; 2013 Nov; 15(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 24176459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: Interrater Agreement between Two Experienced Nurses by Real-Time Triage and Analysis of Influencing Factors to Disagreement of Triage Levels.
    Park JB; Lee J; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Lim TH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 34(28):e189. PubMed ID: 31327176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.
    Betz M; Stempien J; Trivedi S; Bryce R
    CJEM; 2017 Jul; 19(4):265-270. PubMed ID: 27917744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients.
    Downey LV; Zun LS; Burke T
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2015 Apr; 23(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 25082415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.
    Green NA; Durani Y; Brecher D; DePiero A; Loiselle J; Attia M
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Aug; 28(8):753-7. PubMed ID: 22858740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments.
    Ng CJ; Hsu KH; Kuan JT; Chiu TF; Chen WK; Lin HJ; Bullard MJ; Chen JC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2010 Nov; 109(11):828-37. PubMed ID: 21126655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.
    Gravel J; Gouin S; Goldman RD; Osmond MH; Fitzpatrick E; Boutis K; Guimont C; Joubert G; Millar K; Curtis S; Sinclair D; Amre D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 60(1):71-7.e3. PubMed ID: 22305329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.