These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23777994)
21. A comparison of a formal triage scoring system and a quick-look triage approach. Betz M; Stempien J; Wilde A; Bryce R Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 25622182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center. Gravel J; Gouin S; Manzano S; Arsenault M; Amre D Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1262-7. PubMed ID: 18945238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? Jiménez JG; Murray MJ; Beveridge R; Pons JP; Cortés EA; Garrigós JB; Ferré MB CJEM; 2003 Sep; 5(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 17466139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of a computerized version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Gravel J; Gouin S; Bailey B; Roy M; Bergeron S; Amre D Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Oct; 14(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 17761546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Physician workload and the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: the Predictors of Workload in the Emergency Room (POWER) Study. Anderson CK; Zaric GS; Dreyer JF; Carter MW; McLeod SL CJEM; 2009 Jul; 11(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 19594970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating the Reliability of a Remote Acuity Prediction Tool in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department. Nasser L; McLeod SL; Hall JN Ann Emerg Med; 2024 Apr; 83(4):373-379. PubMed ID: 38180398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial. Worster A; Gilboy N; Fernandes CM; Eitel D; Eva K; Geisler R; Tanabe P CJEM; 2004 Jul; 6(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 17381999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effectiveness of a 6-week online course in the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for emergency nurses. Atack L; Rankin JA; Then KL J Emerg Nurs; 2005 Oct; 31(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 16198725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients. Lee JY; Oh SH; Peck EH; Lee JM; Park KN; Kim SH; Youn CS Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 19():68. PubMed ID: 22050641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Examining the relationship between triage acuity and frailty to inform the care of older emergency department patients: Findings from a large Canadian multisite cohort study. Mowbray F; Brousseau AA; Mercier E; Melady D; Émond M; Costa AP CJEM; 2020 Jan; 22(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 31718719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Meeting Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale benchmarks in a rural emergency department. Vlahaki D; Milne WK Can J Rural Med; 2009; 14(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 19594993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inconsistency of emergency department triage. Emergency Department Operations Research Working Group. Wuerz R; Fernandes CM; Alarcon J Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Oct; 32(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 9774926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale. Manos D; Petrie DA; Beveridge RC; Walter S; Ducharme J CJEM; 2002 Jan; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17637144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department. Grafstein E; Innes G; Westman J; Christenson J; Thorne A CJEM; 2003 Sep; 5(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 17466140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability and validity of a new French-language triage algorithm: the ELISA scale. Jobé J; Ghuysen A; Gérard P; Hartstein G; D'Orio V Emerg Med J; 2014 Feb; 31(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 24429249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods. Curran-Sills G; Franc JM CJEM; 2017 Sep; 19(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 27788698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Effectiveness and Relevance of the Canadian Triage System at Times of Overcrowding in the Emergency Department of a Private Tertiary Hospital: A United Arab Emirates (UAE) Study. Kalan L; Chahine RA; Lasfer C Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52921. PubMed ID: 38406095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability and validity of the four-level Chinese emergency triage scale in mainland China: A multicenter assessment. Zhiting G; Jingfen J; Shuihong C; Minfei Y; Yuwei W; Sa W Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Jan; 101():103447. PubMed ID: 31670172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors of Low-Acuity Emergency Department Use by Patients Enrolled in a Family Health Team. Jones P; Jones J; O'Brien K; Lee-Poy M CJEM; 2015 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 26134052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utilizing the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in an oncology urgent care clinic: the university health network experience. Trip K; Boloorchi A; Berman H Can Oncol Nurs J; 2011; 21(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 21462878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]