These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Preparing for a National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission site visit. Davidhizar R; Vance AR ABNF J; 1998; 9(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 9677869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adding options to your nursing program. Tanner SJ Nurse Educ; 2012; 37(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 22327518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Setting the standard for nursing education. Tanner SJ Nurse Educ; 2012; 37(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22157988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The expert site visitor chairperson: supportive, effective, efficient. Wawrzynski M; Davidhizar R J Cult Divers; 2004; 11(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 15689147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The NLNAC mentoring program: demystifying the accreditation process. Nkongho NO Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 16733968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Curriculum evaluation. Using National League for Nursing accrediting commission standards and criteria. Schug V Nurs Educ Perspect; 2012; 33(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 23061187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NLN & NLNAC stand together. Dumas R Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1997; 18(6):334-5. PubMed ID: 9407855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. NLN board votes to establish independent accrediting commission. Allen J; Winer A NLN Update; 1996 Apr; 2(2):1, 12. PubMed ID: 9250091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of NLNAC and CCNE accreditation. Overbay JD; Aaltonen PM Nurse Educ; 2001; 26(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16372450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collaboration among communities. NLN's new Center for Collaborating Organizations and Community Groups introduces exciting plan for health care futures. McCreary M NLN Update; 1996 Apr; 2(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 9250092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How does NLNAC use the recently released criteria for evaluation of nurse practitioner programs? Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(2):107. PubMed ID: 10426104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How does NLNAC support the concept of differentiated practice? Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(5):275. PubMed ID: 10754852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission peer evaluation panel. Davidhizar R ABNF J; 1998; 9(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 9677870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the commission on collegiate nursing education accreditation process and the role of the continuous improvement progress report. Ellis P; Halstead J J Prof Nurs; 2012; 28(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 22261601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]