546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23778092)
1. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemorrhage and/or Microaneurysm Severity and Count in Ultrawide Field Images and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Photography.
Silva PS; El-Rami H; Barham R; Gupta A; Fleming A; van Hemert J; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):970-976. PubMed ID: 28336057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging With Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Aiello LP; Odia I; Glassman AR; Melia M; Jampol LM; Bressler NM; Kiss S; Silva PS; Wykoff CC; Sun JK;
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 137(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30347105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.
Maker MP; Noble J; Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Murtha TJ; Sun JK; Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22385213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distribution of peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultra-wide field fundus imaging in diabetic retinopathy.
Verma A; Alagorie AR; Ramasamy K; van Hemert J; Yadav NK; Pappuru RR; Tufail A; Nittala MG; Sadda SR; Raman R;
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 258(4):725-733. PubMed ID: 31989286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems.
Hirano T; Imai A; Kasamatsu H; Kakihara S; Toriyama Y; Murata T
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):332. PubMed ID: 30572870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral Lesions Identified on Ultrawide Field Imaging Predict Increased Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Progression over 4 Years.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Haddad NM; Kwak H; Dyer KH; Omar AF; Shikari H; Aiello LM; Sun JK; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2015 May; 122(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 25704318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Assessment of the Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Sadda SR; Nittala MG; Taweebanjongsin W; Verma A; Velaga SB; Alagorie AR; Sears CM; Silva PS; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 218():342-352. PubMed ID: 32446737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.
Cavallerano JD; Aiello LP; Cavallerano AA; Katalinic P; Hock K; Kirby R; Aiello LM;
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 140(4):667-73. PubMed ID: 16083842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography.
Venkatesh P; Sharma R; Vashist N; Vohra R; Garg S
Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 22961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
Vujosevic S; Benetti E; Massignan F; Pilotto E; Varano M; Cavarzeran F; Avogaro A; Midena E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
