107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23778696)
1. An automated algorithm for consolidating dates of diagnosis from multiple sources.
Zhang X; Kahn AR; Boscoe FP; Buckley PM
J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 23778696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement of diagnosis and its date for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors between medicare claims and cancer registry data.
Setoguchi S; Solomon DH; Glynn RJ; Cook EF; Levin R; Schneeweiss S
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Jun; 18(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 17447148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.
Dregan A; Moller H; Murray-Thomas T; Gulliford MC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 22727737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between questionnaires and registry data on routes to diagnosis and milestone dates of the cancer diagnostic pathway.
Falborg AZ; Vedsted P; Menon U; Weller D; Neal RD; Reguilon I; Harrison S; Jensen H;
Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 65():101690. PubMed ID: 32114374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Encouraging Health Information Management Graduates to Pursue Cancer Registry Careers.
Peterson J
J Registry Manag; 2016; 43(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 27195997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control of automatically defined cancer cases by the automated registration system of the Venetian Tumour Registry. Quality control of cancer cases automatically registered.
Tognazzo S; Andolfo A; Bovo E; Fiore AR; Greco A; Guzzinati S; Monetti D; Stocco CF; Zambon P
Eur J Public Health; 2005 Dec; 15(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 16051658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Electronic Health Record-based Algorithm to Ascertain the Date of Second Breast Cancer Events.
Chubak J; Onega T; Zhu W; Buist DSM; Hubbard RA
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e81-e87. PubMed ID: 29135770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The role of a hospital-based registry of a regional cancer center for a population-based cancer registry].
Colombani F; Pereira E; Bettaieb J; Gobin L; Cowppli-Bony A; Hoppe S; Coureau G; Picat MQ; Salamon R; Monnereau A; Savès M
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2013 Feb; 61(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23374984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).
Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of billing data from oncology practice to supplement treatment information for cancer surveillance.
Penberthy L; Petkov V; McClish D; Peace S; Overton S; Radhakrishnan S; Gillam C
J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 25153010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can we rely on public data as a source of information for cancer registry in developing countries?
Semnani S; Kabir MJ; Besharat S; Abdolahi N; Danesh A; Roshandel D
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 16(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 16245225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Construction and validation of hospital-based cancer registry using various health records to detect patients with newly diagnosed cancer: experience at Asan Medical Center].
Kim HJ; Cho JH; Lyu Y; Lee SH; Hwang KH; Lee MS
J Prev Med Public Health; 2010 May; 43(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 20534965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linkage of a clinical surgical registry with Medicare inpatient claims data using indirect identifiers.
Lawson EH; Ko CY; Louie R; Han L; Rapp M; Zingmond DS
Surgery; 2013 Mar; 153(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 23122901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer aided warfarin dosing in the Swedish national quality registry AuriculA - Algorithmic suggestions are performing better than manually changed doses.
Grzymala-Lubanski B; Själander S; Renlund H; Svensson PJ; Själander A
Thromb Res; 2013 Feb; 131(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 23232091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An informatics-enabled approach for detection of new tumor registry cases.
Naser R; Roberts J; Salter T; Warner JL; Levy M
J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 24893184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytopathological diagnosis in a cancer registry: a useful diagnostic tool?
Caldarella A; Crocetti E; Taddei GL; Paci E
Cancer; 2007 Apr; 111(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 17334988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The registry case finding engine: an automated tool to identify cancer cases from unstructured, free-text pathology reports and clinical notes.
Hanauer DA; Miela G; Chinnaiyan AM; Chang AE; Blayney DW
J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Nov; 205(5):690-7. PubMed ID: 17964445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer.
Nattinger AB; Laud PW; Bajorunaite R; Sparapani RA; Freeman JL
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1733-49. PubMed ID: 15533184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Danish Cancer Registry.
Gjerstorff ML
Scand J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 39(7 Suppl):42-5. PubMed ID: 21775350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
