These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377887)

  • 21. Usefulness of the Human Genome Project.
    Weis JH
    Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4963):1595. PubMed ID: 2363043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Project to sequence human genome moves on to the starting blocks.
    Nature; 1995 May; 375(6527):93-4. PubMed ID: 7753176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Human Genome Project: two points of view.
    FASEB J; 1990 Aug; 4(11):2941-2. PubMed ID: 2379768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Last-minute deal give NIH 7.1% raise.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1218. PubMed ID: 9411744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The genetic map is back on track after delays.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):804-5. PubMed ID: 2343299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NSF wins, NIH loses in Clinton's 1994 budget.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5104):24-5. PubMed ID: 8465195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genome effort 'still in need of support'.
    Dickson D; Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 May; 393(6682):201. PubMed ID: 9607743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overview of FY 2001 federal budget request.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):259. PubMed ID: 10700131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH launches the final push to sequence the genome.
    Marshall E; Pennisi E
    Science; 1996 Apr; 272(5259):188-9. PubMed ID: 8602498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overview of FY 2000 US federal budget request.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Mar; 17(3):219. PubMed ID: 10096278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. SOS (again) at the Department of Energy.
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6793):219. PubMed ID: 10917491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ahead of schedule and on budget.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1994 Oct; 266(5183):199. PubMed ID: 7939646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human genome project. Emphasis turns from mapping to large-scale sequencing.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5215):1270-1. PubMed ID: 7761844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomedical research 'revolution' drives push for balanced funding.
    Fintor L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Oct; 93(19):1442-3. PubMed ID: 11584054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Whatever happened to the genetic map?
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 Jan; 247(4940):281-2. PubMed ID: 2296718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The authorization and appropriation process.
    Wilson MA
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1990; 26(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 2094510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genome ethics panel comes under the microscope at NIH.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6581):357. PubMed ID: 8632783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The genome project's conscience.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Oct; 274(5287):488-90. PubMed ID: 8927996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genome project goes commercial.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5093):300-2. PubMed ID: 8419997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. DNA sequencers' trial by fire.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 1998 May; 280(5365):814-7. PubMed ID: 9599151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.