116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377898)
1. Bone density distribution within the femoral head and neck. An examination by high-resolution computed tomography.
Field RE; Dixon AK; Lawrence JP; Rushton N
Skeletal Radiol; 1990; 19(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 2377898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quantitative CT assessment of the proximal femur. Experimental studies on its correlation with breaking load in femoral neck fractures].
Buitrago-Téllez CH; Bonnaire F; Schulze C; Gufler H; Hönninger A; Kuner E; Langer M
Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 9465959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).
Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Rezaei A; Uthamaraj S; Rossman T; Bronk JT; Bolander M; Lambert V; McEligot S; Entwistle R; Giambini H; Jasiuk I; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L
J Vis Exp; 2017 Mar; (121):. PubMed ID: 28362373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.
Bousson V; Le Bras A; Roqueplan F; Kang Y; Mitton D; Kolta S; Bergot C; Skalli W; Vicaut E; Kalender W; Engelke K; Laredo JD
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 16547689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total cross-sectional area of the femoral neck nutrient foramina measured to assess arterial vascular beds in the femoral head.
Mei J; Quan K; Wang H; Dai Y; Zhang F; Ni M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Dec; 14(1):439. PubMed ID: 31836021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution of trabecular and cortical bone related to geometry. A quantitative computed tomography study of the femoral neck.
Kuiper JW; Van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL
Invest Radiol; 1997 Feb; 32(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 9039579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Laroche M; Costa L; Bernard J; Puget J; Constantin A; Cantagrel A; Mazières B
Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1998 Jun; 65(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 9670331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The combination of structural parameters and areal bone mineral density improves relation to proximal femur strength: an in vitro study with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Hansen S; Jensen JE; Ahrberg F; Hauge EM; Brixen K
Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Oct; 89(4):335-46. PubMed ID: 21874544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of correlation between femoral neck anteversion and acetabular orientation. Radiography and computed tomography in cadavers and in vivo.
Høiseth A; Reikerås O; Fønstelien E
Acta Orthop Scand; 1989 Feb; 60(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 2929305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relative contribution of the medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries to the vascularity of the head and neck of the femur: a quantitative MRI-based assessment.
Dewar DC; Lazaro LE; Klinger CE; Sculco PK; Dyke JP; Ni AY; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1582-1588. PubMed ID: 27909118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computerized tomography of proximal femoral trabecular patterns.
Kerr R; Resnick D; Sartoris DJ; Kursunoglu S; Pineda C; Haghighi P; Greenway G; Guerra J
J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 3950808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glenoid neck Hounsfield units on computed tomography can accurately identify patients with low bone mineral density.
Nappo KE; Christensen DL; Wolfe JA; Tintle SM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1268-1274. PubMed ID: 29397295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement.
Harty JA; Devitt B; Harty LC; Molloy M; McGuinness A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Dec; 125(10):693-5. PubMed ID: 16237532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral anteversion.
Murphy SB; Simon SR; Kijewski PK; Wilkinson RH; Griscom NT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Oct; 69(8):1169-76. PubMed ID: 3667647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological analysis of the proximal femur using quantitative computed tomography.
Stiehl JB; Jacobson D; Carrera G
Int Orthop; 2007 Jun; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 16896872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A computer-aided system for automatic extraction of femur neck trabecular bone architecture using isotropic volume construction from clinical hip computed tomography images.
Vivekanandhan S; Subramaniam J; Mariamichael A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Oct; 230(10):930-41. PubMed ID: 27511914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral neck torsion angle measurement by computed tomography.
Mesgarzadeh M; Revesz G; Bonakdarpour A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 3655041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are patients with a nonunion after a femoral neck fracture more osteoporotic than others? BMD measurement before the choice of treatment?: A pilot study of hip BMD and biochemical bone markers in patients with femoral neck fractures.
Hedström M
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Feb; 75(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15022806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
