These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study. Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain. Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings. Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment. Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality. Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis. Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement. Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis. Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals. Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies. Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation. Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading orthopedics journals: A systematic review. Zhi X; Zhang Z; Cui J; Zhai X; Chen X; Su J Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 28928047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement. Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P; J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():68-89. PubMed ID: 26348799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management. Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]