BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23781182)

  • 1. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short- and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior.
    Espín AM; Exadaktylos F; Herrmann B; Brañas-Garza P
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():214. PubMed ID: 26347625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.
    Rand DG; Tarnita CE; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(7):2581-6. PubMed ID: 23341593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts.
    Li Q; Wang C; Taxer J; Yang Z; Zheng Y; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():683. PubMed ID: 28536542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How much is our fairness worth? The effect of raising stakes on offers by Proposers and minimum acceptable offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games.
    Novakova J; Flegr J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60966. PubMed ID: 23580080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suffering makes you egoist: acute pain increases acceptance rates and reduces fairness during a bilateral ultimatum game.
    Mancini A; Betti V; Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26008. PubMed ID: 22022492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
    Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal emotion processing, but intact fairness and intentionality considerations during social decision-making in schizophrenia.
    de la Asuncion J; Docx L; Sabbe B; Morrens M; de Bruijn ER
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1058. PubMed ID: 26257699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.
    Zheng Y; Cheng X; Xu J; Zheng L; Li L; Yang G; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():847. PubMed ID: 28611705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.