These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23781208)

  • 1. Groups of bats improve sonar efficiency through mutual suppression of pulse emissions.
    Jarvis J; Jackson W; Smotherman M
    Front Physiol; 2013; 4():140. PubMed ID: 23781208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression of emission rates improves sonar performance by flying bats.
    Adams AM; Davis K; Smotherman M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41641. PubMed ID: 28139707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.
    Luo J; Moss CF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(41):10978-10983. PubMed ID: 28973851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid frequency control of sonar sounds by the FM bat, Miniopterus fuliginosus, in response to spectral overlap.
    Hase K; Miyamoto T; Kobayasi KI; Hiryu S
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():126-33. PubMed ID: 27157002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive sonar call timing supports target tracking in echolocating bats.
    Kothari NB; Wohlgemuth MJ; Moss CF
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Sep; 221(Pt 18):. PubMed ID: 29997156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A mechanism for antiphonal echolocation by Free-tailed bats.
    Jarvis J; Bohn KM; Tressler J; Smotherman M
    Anim Behav; 2010 Apr; 79(4):787-796. PubMed ID: 20419063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Echo-acoustic flow shapes object representation in spatially complex acoustic scenes.
    Greiter W; Firzlaff U
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2113-2124. PubMed ID: 28275060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flying in silence: Echolocating bats cease vocalizing to avoid sonar jamming.
    Chiu C; Xian W; Moss CF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Sep; 105(35):13116-21. PubMed ID: 18725624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?
    Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Hristov NI; Conner WE
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Jul; 214(Pt 14):2416-25. PubMed ID: 21697434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sonar aperture and its neural representation in bats.
    Heinrich M; Warmbold A; Hoffmann S; Firzlaff U; Wiegrebe L
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15618-27. PubMed ID: 22031907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vocal control of acoustic information for sonar discriminations by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
    Wadsworth J; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2265-71. PubMed ID: 10790052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural echolocation sequences evoke echo-delay selectivity in the auditory midbrain of the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus.
    Macías S; Luo J; Moss CF
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 120(3):1323-1339. PubMed ID: 29924708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.
    Kick SA; Simmons JA
    J Neurosci; 1984 Nov; 4(11):2725-37. PubMed ID: 6502201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active acoustic interference elicits echolocation changes in heterospecific bats.
    Jones TK; Wohlgemuth MJ; Conner WE
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Aug; 221(Pt 15):. PubMed ID: 29950451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modeling approach to explain pulse design in bats.
    Boonman A; Ostwald J
    Biol Cybern; 2007 Aug; 97(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 17610077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bats' avoidance of real and virtual objects: implications for the sonar coding of object size.
    Goerlitz HR; Genzel D; Wiegrebe L
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jan; 89(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22085788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Timing matters: sonar call groups facilitate target localization in bats.
    Kothari NB; Wohlgemuth MJ; Hulgard K; Surlykke A; Moss CF
    Front Physiol; 2014; 5():168. PubMed ID: 24860509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coordinated Control of Acoustical Field of View and Flight in Three-Dimensional Space for Consecutive Capture by Echolocating Bats during Natural Foraging.
    Sumiya M; Fujioka E; Motoi K; Kondo M; Hiryu S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169995. PubMed ID: 28085936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive changes in echolocation sounds by Pipistrellus abramus in response to artificial jamming sounds.
    Takahashi E; Hyomoto K; Riquimaroux H; Watanabe Y; Ohta T; Hiryu S
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Aug; 217(Pt 16):2885-91. PubMed ID: 25122918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.
    Jones G; Siemers BM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2011 May; 197(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 20686895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.