These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23782817)

  • 1. HyVE: hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback and substitution in rehabilitation.
    D'Alonzo M; Dosen S; Cipriani C; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Mar; 22(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 23782817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing temporal aspects of visual, tactile, and microstimulation feedback for motor control.
    Godlove JM; Whaite EO; Batista AP
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Aug; 11(4):046025. PubMed ID: 25028989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues.
    Henrich MC; Garenfeld MA; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 May; 242(5):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 38467759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback.
    Paredes LP; Dosen S; Rattay F; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 12():35. PubMed ID: 25889752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback.
    Dosen S; Schaeffer MC; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 11():138. PubMed ID: 25224266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel Electrode Designs for Electrotactile Stimulation of the Finger: A Comparative Assessment.
    Garenfeld MA; Henrich MC; Isakovic M; Malesevic J; Strbac M; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2023; 16(4):748-759. PubMed ID: 37801385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving electrotactile communication with a multi-pad electrode under cognitive load.
    Jure FA; Spaich EG; Petrini L; Malešević J; Kostić M; Štrbac M; Došen S
    Artif Organs; 2024 Jun; 48(6):626-635. PubMed ID: 38149317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conductive block copolymer elastomers and psychophysical thresholding for accurate haptic effects.
    Blau R; Abdal A; Root N; Chen AX; Rafeedi T; Ramji R; Qie Y; Kim T; Navarro A; Chin J; Becerra LL; Edmunds SJ; Russman SM; Dayeh SA; Fenning DP; Rouw R; Lipomi DJ
    Sci Robot; 2024 Jun; 9(91):eadk3925. PubMed ID: 38865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.
    Lozano CA; Kaczmarek KA; Santello M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2009 Jun; 26(2):50-63. PubMed ID: 19697262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving Tongue Command Accuracy: Unlocking the Power of Electrotactile Feedback Training.
    Jiang B; Dollahon D; Manoharan S; Oh S; Park H; Kim J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-5. PubMed ID: 38083132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of perception by transcutaneous electrical Stimulation in terms of tingling intensity and temporal dynamics.
    Manoharan S; Park H
    Biomed Eng Lett; 2024 Jan; 14(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 38186955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring Perceptual Intensity Properties Using Electrotactile Stimulation on Fingertips.
    Zhou Z; Wang X; Yang Y; Zeng J; Liu H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2023; 16(4):805-815. PubMed ID: 37903034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The tongue display unit (TDU) for electrotactile spatiotemporal pattern presentation.
    Kaczmarek KA
    Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 28748231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of proprioception in upper limb prostheses through non-invasive strategies: a review.
    Papaleo ED; D'Alonzo M; Fiori F; Piombino V; Falato E; Pilato F; De Liso A; Di Lazzaro V; Di Pino G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Sep; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 37689701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Encoding force modulation in two electrotactile feedback parameters strengthens sensory integration according to maximum likelihood estimation.
    Gholinezhad S; Farina D; Dosen S; Dideriksen J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):12461. PubMed ID: 37528160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding.
    Malešević J; Kostić M; Jure FA; Spaich EG; Došen S; Ilić V; Bijelić G; Štrbac M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
    Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.
    Pandarinath C; Bensmaia SJ
    Physiol Rev; 2022 Apr; 102(2):551-604. PubMed ID: 34541898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.
    Bensmaia SJ; Tyler DJ; Micera S
    Nat Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 7(4):443-455. PubMed ID: 33230305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-informative vision improves spatial tactile discrimination on the shoulder but does not influence detection sensitivity.
    Leo F; Nataletti S; Brayda L
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Dec; 238(12):2865-2875. PubMed ID: 33051694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.