BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23783222)

  • 1. Can decision biases improve insurance outcomes? An experiment on status quo bias in health insurance choice.
    Krieger M; Felder S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2013 Jun; 10(6):2560-77. PubMed ID: 23783222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Omission bias and decision making in pulmonary and critical care medicine.
    Aberegg SK; Haponik EF; Terry PB
    Chest; 2005 Sep; 128(3):1497-505. PubMed ID: 16162749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing care-seeking as well as insurance-seeking selection biases in estimating the impact of health insurance on out-of-pocket expenditure.
    Ali S; Cookson R; Dusheiko M
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():127-140. PubMed ID: 28161670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing Unforced Choice Experiments to Inform Health Care Decision Making: Implications of Using Opt-Out, Neither, or Status Quo Alternatives in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Determann D; Gyrd-Hansen D; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob EW; Steyerberg EW; Lambooij MS; Bjørnskov Pedersen L
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Aug; 39(6):681-692. PubMed ID: 31354031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of attention in status quo bias.
    Miceli AC; Suri GR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2122-2138. PubMed ID: 36301176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bridging the gap: Experimental evidence on information provision and health insurance choices.
    Quiroga Gutierrez AC; Boes S
    Health Econ; 2024 Jun; 33(6):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 38450905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Default neglect in attempts at social influence.
    Zlatev JJ; Daniels DP; Kim H; Neale MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Dec; 114(52):13643-13648. PubMed ID: 29222183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional Selection Mediates Framing and Risk-Bias Effects.
    Glickman M; Tsetsos K; Usher M
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):2010-2019. PubMed ID: 30403368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children.
    Loeb KL; Radnitz C; Keller K; Schwartz MB; Marcus S; Pierson RN; Shannon M; DeLaurentis D
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():368-375. PubMed ID: 28257942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating the origin and consequences of endogenous default options in repeated economic choices.
    Couto J; van Maanen L; Lebreton M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0232385. PubMed ID: 32790729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumer information and biased selection in the demand for coverage supplementing Medicare.
    Davidson BN; Sofaer S; Gertler P
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 May; 34(9):1023-34. PubMed ID: 1631602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complementary health insurance in France. Who pays? Why? Who will suffer from public disengagement?
    Saliba B; Ventelou B
    Health Policy; 2007 May; 81(2-3):166-82. PubMed ID: 16831483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.
    Handel BR
    Am Econ Rev; 2013 Dec; 103(7):2643-82. PubMed ID: 29533561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient inertia and the status quo bias: when an inferior option is preferred.
    Suri G; Sheppes G; Schwartz C; Gross JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1763-9. PubMed ID: 23873580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age and choice in health insurance: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.
    Becker K; Zweifel P
    Patient; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 22272755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Undercontribution bias in health care spending account decisions.
    Schweitzer ME; Hershey JC
    Benefits Q; 1997; 13(2):36-46. PubMed ID: 10167155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding rational non-adherence to medications. A discrete choice experiment in a community sample in Australia.
    Laba TL; Brien JA; Jan S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2012 Jun; 13():61. PubMed ID: 22715853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
    Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lessons from the evolution of 401(k) retirement plans for increased consumerism in health care: an application of behavioral research.
    DiCenzo J; Fronstin P
    EBRI Issue Brief; 2008 Aug; (320):1, 3-26. PubMed ID: 18724525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.