These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2378339)

  • 21. Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children?
    Šuláková T; Šuláková A; Strnadel J; Pavlíček J; Obermannová B; Feber J
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2017 Apr; 19(4):381-387. PubMed ID: 28383188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A convenient method to verify the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitors by the auscultatory method: A smartphone-based app.
    Zhang Z; Xi W; Wang B; Chu G; Wang F
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2019 Feb; 21(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 30570199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From Korotkoff and Marey to automatic non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure measurement: does easiness come with reliability?
    Benmira A; Perez-Martin A; Schuster I; Aichoun I; Coudray S; Bereksi-Reguig F; Dauzat M
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 26641026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Cuff Design on Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements.
    Ringrose JS; McLean D; Ao P; Yousefi F; Sankaralingam S; Millay J; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1063-9. PubMed ID: 27099256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blood pressure measurement by oscillometric and auscultatory methods in normotensive pregnant women.
    Vigato ES; Lamas JLT
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2019 Dec; 72(suppl 3):162-169. PubMed ID: 31851249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the accuracy of non-invasive automatic blood pressure monitors.
    Kawahara M
    Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 2096748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring with concurrent auscultatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.
    Semret M; Zidehsarai M; Agarwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Oct; 10(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 16205443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of an automatic instrument for blood pressure measurement in children. The Bogalusa Heart Study.
    Wattigney WA; Webber LS; Lawrence MD; Berenson GS
    Am J Hypertens; 1996 Mar; 9(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8695025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of anatomical structures on adult forearm and upper arm noninvasive blood pressures.
    Schell KA; Richards JG; Farquhar WB
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17303983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.
    Graettinger WF; Lipson JL; Cheung DG; Weber MA
    Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings.
    Shahriari M; Rotenberg DK; Nielsen JK; Wiinberg N; Nielsen PE
    Blood Press; 2003; 12(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12875477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Limitations of an oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor in physically active children.
    Jacoby AC; Fixler DE; Torres EJ
    J Pediatr; 1993 Feb; 122(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 8429436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences in oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements recorded by different revisions of the Philips Component Monitoring System.
    Murray IC; Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 16077268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
    de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation Between Blood Pressure Measurement by Non-invasive and Invasive Methods in Critically-ill Children.
    Krishna BV; Das S; Sen S
    Indian Pediatr; 2018 Apr; 55(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 29428917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
    Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of semiautomatic and automatic devices for home blood pressure measurement: comparison between cuff-oscillometric and microphone methods.
    Imai Y; Abe K; Sasaki S; Minami N; Munakata M; Sakuma H; Hashimoto J; Sekino H; Imai K; Yoshinaga K
    J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):983-90. PubMed ID: 2628499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.