These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2378339)

  • 41. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
    Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of an automatic oscillometric method and of various cuffs for the measurement of arterial pressure in the neonate.
    Pellegrini-Caliumi G; Agostino R; Nodari S; Maffei G; Moretti C; Bucci G
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1982 Sep; 71(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 7180448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biases in the measurement of arterial pressure.
    Finnie KJ; Watts DG; Armstrong PW
    Crit Care Med; 1984 Nov; 12(11):965-8. PubMed ID: 6499482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison between oscillometric and auscultatory methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in hemodialysis patients.
    Fagugli RM; Vecchi L; Valente F; Santirosi P; Laviola MM
    Clin Nephrol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 12005244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of blood pressure measurement methods on the assessment of differences in blood pressure levels between patients with normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetes and healthy controls.
    Vervoort G; Wetzels JF; Lutterman JA; Berden JH; Thien T; Smits P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1999 Feb; 13(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 10100060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.
    van Popele NM; Bos WJ; de Beer NA; van Der Kuip DA; Hofman A; Grobbee DE; Witteman JC
    Hypertension; 2000 Oct; 36(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 11040223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A new approach to reproducibility assessment: clinical evaluation of SpaceLabs Medical oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Sun M; Tien J; Jones R; Ward R
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1996; 30(5):439-48. PubMed ID: 8909705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension.
    Šelmytė-Besusparė A; Barysienė J; Petrikonytė D; Aidietis A; Marinskis G; Laucevičius A
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Mar; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28335730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of the UEBE Visomat Double Comfort upper arm blood pressure monitor, in oscillometric mode, for clinic use and self-measurement in a general population according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, revision 2010.
    Masiero S; Fania C; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):262-4. PubMed ID: 21885959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
    Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Systolic peak foot-to-apex time interval, a novel oscillometric technique for systolic blood pressure measurement.
    Benmira AM; Perez-Martin A; Coudray S; Schuster I; Aichoun I; Laurent J; Bereski-Reguig F; Dauzat M
    J Hypertens; 2017 May; 35(5):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 28099195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients.
    Bur A; Hirschl MM; Herkner H; Oschatz E; Kofler J; Woisetschläger C; Laggner AN
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Feb; 28(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 10708169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the sphygmooscillographic method with the direct and auscultatory methods of measuring blood pressure.
    Sapinski A
    J Clin Monit; 1994 Nov; 10(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 7836971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques.
    Zheng D; Amoore JN; Mieke S; Murray A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Jan; 49(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 21042950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.