These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23784009)
1. Predicting raters' transparency judgments of English and Chinese morphological constituents using latent semantic analysis. Wang HC; Hsu LC; Tien YM; Pomplun M Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):284-306. PubMed ID: 23784009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Compound fracture: the role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Libben G; Gibson M; Yoon YB; Sandra D Brain Lang; 2003 Jan; 84(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 12537951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience. Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning. Hollis G; Westbury C; Lefsrud L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1603-1619. PubMed ID: 27251936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models. Hollis G Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1350-1370. PubMed ID: 28707176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach. Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. Frisson S; Niswander-Klement E; Pollatsek A Br J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 99(Pt 1):87-107. PubMed ID: 17535465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis. Tse CS; Yap MJ Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition. Smolka E; Eulitz C Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compounding matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound words. Davis CP; Libben G; Segalowitz SJ Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():44-52. PubMed ID: 30557749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enter sandman: Compound processing and semantic transparency in a compositional perspective. Günther F; Marelli M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 30570322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphological decomposition in Chinese compound word recognition: Electrophysiological evidence. Wei Y; Niu Y; Taft M; Carreiras M Brain Lang; 2023 Jun; 241():105267. PubMed ID: 37121022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words. Xu J; Taft M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words. Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness. Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LaDEP: A large database of English pseudo-compounds. Auch L; Pérez Cruz K; Gagné CL; Spalding TL Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2606-2622. PubMed ID: 37464152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ERP study on the time course of phonological and semantic activation in Chinese word recognition. Zhang Q; Zhang JX; Kong L Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 19358866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. Kenett YN; Levi E; Anaki D; Faust M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1470-1489. PubMed ID: 28240936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Marelli M; Baroni M Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):485-515. PubMed ID: 26120909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]