These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23784009)

  • 21. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
    Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Semantic ambiguity effects on traditional Chinese character naming: A corpus-based approach.
    Chang YN; Lee CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2292-2304. PubMed ID: 29124717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.
    Rodd JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision.
    Chang YN; Lee CY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32789580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Iconicity of simple Chinese characters.
    Xiao W; Treiman R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):954-60. PubMed ID: 22399244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning.
    Hoffman P; Rogers TT; Ralph MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2432-46. PubMed ID: 21254804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are there task-specific effects in morphological processing? Examining semantic transparency effects in semantic categorisation and lexical decision.
    Chee QW; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Nov; 75(11):2073-2086. PubMed ID: 35083947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Semantic transparency effects in German compounds: A large dataset and multiple-task investigation.
    Günther F; Marelli M; Bölte J
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1208-1224. PubMed ID: 32052353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of spoken compound words.
    Creemers A; Embick D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 May; 48(5):734-751. PubMed ID: 35389704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in english compound and pseudocompound words.
    Gagné CL; Spalding TL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1489-95. PubMed ID: 26889686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: consequences for representation, processing, and impairment.
    Libben G
    Brain Lang; 1998 Jan; 61(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 9448929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English.
    Ricketts J; Davies R; Masterson J; Stuart M; Duff FJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():330-345. PubMed ID: 27416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming . . . eventually.
    Heyer V; Kornishova D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1112-1124. PubMed ID: 28332938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: an eye-movement-contingent display change study.
    Cui L; Yan G; Bai X; Hyönä J; Wang S; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):527-47. PubMed ID: 22809368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
    Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can prediction-based distributional semantic models predict typicality?
    Heyman T; Heyman G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2084-2109. PubMed ID: 30704340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.