164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23784677)
1. [Diagnostic histopathology of prostate cancer].
Kristiansen G
Urologe A; 2013 Jul; 52(7):933-41. PubMed ID: 23784677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostics of radical prostatectomy specimens. Results of the 2009 consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology].
Kristiansen G; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Pathologe; 2012 Jul; 33(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 22552640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potentially clinically relevant prostate cancer is found more frequently after complete than after partial histopathological processing of radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.
Fritsche HM; Aziz A; Eder F; Otto W; Denzinger S; Wieland WF; May M; Hofstädter F; Hartmann A; Burger M
Virchows Arch; 2012 Dec; 461(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 23052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating FTIR based histopathology for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Baker MJ; Gazi E; Brown MD; Shanks JH; Clarke NW; Gardner P
J Biophotonics; 2009 Feb; 2(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 19343689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Kwast T
Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12647209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Updates on Grading and Staging of Prostate Cancer.
Braunhut BL; Punnen S; Kryvenko ON
Surg Pathol Clin; 2018 Dec; 11(4):759-774. PubMed ID: 30447840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Update on prostate pathology.
Osunkoya AO
Pathology; 2012 Aug; 44(5):391-406. PubMed ID: 22772344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central quadrant procurement of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Morrison C; Cheney R; Johnson CS; Smith G; Mohler JL
Prostate; 2009 May; 69(7):770-3. PubMed ID: 19204997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods of radical prostatectomy specimen processing: a novel technique for harvesting fresh prostate cancer tissue and review of processing techniques.
Bova GS; Fox WM; Epstein JI
Mod Pathol; 1993 Mar; 6(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 8483892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate. Practice parameters, pathologic staging, and handling radical prostatectomy specimens.
Sakr WA; Grignon DJ
Urol Clin North Am; 1999 Aug; 26(3):453-63, v. PubMed ID: 10494284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer].
Fromont G; Molinié V; Soulié M; Salomon L
Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26519964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidental Prostate Adenocarcinoma in Cystoprostatectomy Specimens: Partial Versus Complete Prostate Sampling.
Filter ER; Gabril MY; Gomez JA; Wang PZT; Chin JL; Izawa J; Moussa M
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Aug; 25(5):414-420. PubMed ID: 28381150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathology of localized prostate cancer. Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Prognostic Parameters in Localized Prostate Cancer. Stockholm, Sweden, May 12-13, 1993.
Murphy GP; Busch C; Abrahamsson PA; Epstein JI; McNeal JE; Miller GJ; Mostofi FK; Nagle RB; Nordling S; Parkinson C
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1994; 162():7-42; discussion 115-27. PubMed ID: 7817162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of digital maps and sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Trpkov K; Warman L
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1751-2; author reply 1752. PubMed ID: 17149939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics].
Helpap B; Egevad L
Urologe A; 2007 Jan; 46(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 17111167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probability based diagnostic biopsy specimens as predictors of tumor grade and stage found.
Tsui KH; Shen BY; Sun GH; Lee SH; Chang PL
Arch Androl; 2004; 50(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 15551747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
