431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23785016)
1. Functional diagnosis of coronary stenoses using pressure drop coefficient: a pilot study in humans.
Kolli KK; Helmy TA; Peelukhana SV; Arif I; Leesar MA; Back LH; Banerjee RK; Effat MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 83(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 23785016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis.
Kolli KK; van de Hoef TP; Effat MA; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Leesar MA; Imran A; Piek JJ; Helmy TA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 26424295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.
Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional and anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery stenoses.
Sinha Roy A; Back MR; Khoury SF; Schneeberger EW; Back LH; Velury VV; Millard RW; Banerjee RK
J Surg Res; 2008 Nov; 150(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 18262546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of the acute Pd/Pa drop after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion to rule out significant FFR: CANICA (Can intracoronary nitroglycerin predict fractional flow reserve without adenosine?) multicenter study.
Martin-Reyes R; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Franco-Pelaez J; Lopez-Palop R; Telleria Arrieta M; Amat Santos IJ; Carrillo Saez P; Sanchez-Recalde A; Sanmartin Pena JC; Garcia Camarero T; Brugaletta S; Gimeno de Carlos F; Pinero A; Sorto Sanchez DC; Frutos A; Lasa Larraya G; Navarro F; Farre J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 26213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of regadenoson for measurement of fractional flow reserve.
Prasad A; Zareh M; Doherty R; Gopal A; Vora H; Somma K; Mehra A; Clavijo LC; Matthews RV; Shavelle DM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 83(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 23765847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve.
Meimoun P; Clerc J; Ardourel D; Djou U; Martis S; Botoro T; Elmkies F; Zemir H; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):999-1007. PubMed ID: 27752796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between non-invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve to assess the functional significance of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity.
Meimoun P; Sayah S; Luycx-Bore A; Boulanger J; Elmkies F; Benali T; Zemir H; Doutrelan L; Clerc J
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 24(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 21353763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic uncertainties during assessment of serial coronary stenoses: an in vitro study.
D'Souza GA; Peelukhana SV; Banerjee RK
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Feb; 136(2):021026. PubMed ID: 24362785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining Baseline Distal-to-Aortic Pressure Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in the Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity.
Echavarría-Pinto M; van de Hoef TP; van Lavieren MA; Nijjer S; Ibañez B; Pocock S; Quirós A; Davies J; Meuwissen M; Serruys PW; Macaya C; Piek JJ; Escaned J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1681-91. PubMed ID: 26585618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of a hybrid approach of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve using high-dose intracoronary adenosine to characterize intermediate coronary lesions: Results of the PALS (Practical Assessment of Lesion Severity) prospective study.
Rivero F; Cuesta J; Bastante T; Benedicto A; García-Guimaraes M; Fuentes-Ferrer M; Alvarado T; Alfonso F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 28544741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of variable native arterial diameter and vasculature status on coronary diagnostic parameters.
Goswami I; Peelukhana SV; Al-Rjoub MF; Back LH; Banerjee RK
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Sep; 135(9):91005. PubMed ID: 23817842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve: Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment.
Ahn SG; Suh J; Hung OY; Lee HS; Bouchi YH; Zeng W; Gandhi R; Eshtehardi P; Gogas BD; Samady H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(10):999-1007. PubMed ID: 28521932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography).
Hennigan B; Oldroyd KG; Berry C; Johnson N; McClure J; McCartney P; McEntegart MB; Eteiba H; Petrie MC; Rocchiccioli P; Good R; Lindsay MM; Hood S; Watkins S
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27834663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.
Jeremias A; Whitbourn RJ; Filardo SD; Fitzgerald PJ; Cohen DJ; Tuzcu EM; Anderson WD; Abizaid AA; Mintz GS; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 11011341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.
Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Dijksman LM; van den Berg AJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Röther J; Achenbach S; Tröbs M; Blachutzik F; Nef H; Marwan M; Schlundt C
Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 27307094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reactive myocardial hyperaemia for functional assessment of coronary stenosis severity.
Stoller M; Seiler C
EuroIntervention; 2017 Jun; 13(2):e201-e209. PubMed ID: 27993753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
