BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23785017)

  • 1. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
    Kramer MS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editors and authors: two halves of a whole.
    Borus JF
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 38(2):224-5. PubMed ID: 24477900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Footnotes, acknowledgments, and authorship: toward greater responsibility, accountability, and transparency.
    Liesegang TJ; Bartley GB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 158(6):1103-4. PubMed ID: 25457700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
    Kennedy MS
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
    Greaves M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the quality of the peer review process: author and editorial board member perspectives.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 Oct; 40(8):701-4. PubMed ID: 23021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Financial disclosure of reviewers.
    Parameswaran K
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Oct; 168(8):1010; author reply 1010. PubMed ID: 14555459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
    Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
    Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of differences between peer reviewers suggested by authors and by editors.
    Cummings P
    JAMA; 2006 Sep; 296(10):1231; author reply 1231-2. PubMed ID: 16968843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A thank you note from the editor-in-chief.
    Farrell GC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 22188026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.
    Clark RK
    Br Dent J; 2012 Aug; 213(4):153-4. PubMed ID: 22918342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ARRIVE guidelines: a resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency.
    Blomme EA
    Vet J; 2011 Sep; 189(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 21924210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergent areas to visualize by the journal strategy holders.
    Babu A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):i-ii. PubMed ID: 24858778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.