221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23785442)
1. Let's all speak together! Exploring the masking effects of various languages on spoken word identification in multi-linguistic babble.
Gautreau A; Hoen M; Meunier F
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e65668. PubMed ID: 23785442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.
Van Engen KJ; Bradlow AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):519-26. PubMed ID: 17297805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.
Simpson SA; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):2775-8. PubMed ID: 16334654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effects of Iconic Gestures and Babble Language on Word Intelligibility in Sentence Context.
Wilms V; Drijvers L; Brouwer S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 May; 65(5):1822-1838. PubMed ID: 35439423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation.
Kadem M; Herrmann B; Rodd JM; Johnsrude IS
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520964068. PubMed ID: 33124518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
Calandruccio L; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptance noise level: effects of the speech signal, babble, and listener language.
Shi LF; Azcona G; Buten L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):497-508. PubMed ID: 25629439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification.
Bent T; Holt RF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1677-86. PubMed ID: 23464037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
