These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23785442)

  • 21. The effects of speech masking on neural tracking of acoustic and semantic features of natural speech.
    Yasmin S; Irsik VC; Johnsrude IS; Herrmann B
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jul; 186():108584. PubMed ID: 37169066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do age and linguistic background alter the audiovisual advantage when listening to speech in the presence of energetic and informational masking?
    Avivi-Reich M; Puka K; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):242-261. PubMed ID: 29039045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Viswanathan N; Kokkinakis K; Williams BT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Feb; 61(2):428-435. PubMed ID: 29396580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of linguistic context and noise type on speech comprehension.
    Fitzgerald LP; DeDe G; Shen J
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1345619. PubMed ID: 38375107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recognition of speech produced in noise.
    Pittman AL; Wiley TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 11407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cortical tracking of lexical speech units in a multi-talker background is immature in school-aged children.
    Niesen M; Bourguignon M; Bertels J; Vander Ghinst M; Wens V; Goldman S; De Tiège X
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119770. PubMed ID: 36462732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise.
    Hu H; Xi X; Wong LLN; Hochmuth S; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):838-850. PubMed ID: 30178681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of language, spatial factors, masker type and memory span on speech-in-noise thresholds in sequential bilingual children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Fels J; Ljung R
    Scand J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 59(6):567-577. PubMed ID: 30137681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids.
    Jonas Brännström K; von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modulation of Cross-Language Activation During Bilingual Auditory Word Recognition: Effects of Language Experience but Not Competing Background Noise.
    Fricke M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():674157. PubMed ID: 35282207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23656099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.