232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23785935)
1. On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points.
Jacquet W; Nyssen E; Ibel G; Vannet BV
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23785935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology.
Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tooth-size discrepancy: a comparison between manual and digital methods.
Correia GD; Habib FA; Vogel CJ
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):107-13. PubMed ID: 25279529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts?
Dowling AH; Burns A; Macauley D; Garvey TM; Fleming GJ
J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 24012518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion.
Bayome M; Park JH; Han SH; Baek SH; Sameshima GT; Kook YA
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine.
Nouri M; Farzan A; Baghban AR; Massudi R
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25741826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
