These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23786205)

  • 1. Estimation of the common risk difference in stratified paired binary data with homogeneous stratum effect.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):848-55. PubMed ID: 23786205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing homogeneity of stratum effects in stratified paired binary data.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Wang DH; Shen H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 24697196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimators and confidence intervals for the proportion using binary auxiliary information with applications to pharmaceutical studies.
    Rueda M; Muñoz JF; Arcos A; Álvarez E; Martínez S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):526-54. PubMed ID: 21442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommended tests and confidence intervals for paired binomial proportions.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2850-75. PubMed ID: 24648355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: stratify or not?
    Qu Y; Zhao YD; Rahardja D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18991110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.
    Liu JP; Fan HY; Ma MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 16279349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.
    Pradhan V; Menon S; Das U
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 23296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence-interval construction for rate ratio in matched-pair studies with incomplete data.
    Li HQ; Chan IS; Tang ML; Tian GL; Tang NS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):546-68. PubMed ID: 24697611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.
    Wang W; Shan G
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):985-95. PubMed ID: 26228945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical inference for clinical trials with binary responses when there is a shift in patient population.
    Yang LY; Chi Y; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):437-52. PubMed ID: 21442518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
    Tu D
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On two-sample McNemar test.
    Xiang JX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 25629432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on effective sample size for constructing confidence intervals for the difference of two proportions.
    Liu GF
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 22337507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data.
    Lennox KP; Sherman M
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2952-66. PubMed ID: 19691023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
    Agresti A; Min Y
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 14695640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size and power for McNemar's test with clustered data.
    Gönen M
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2283-94. PubMed ID: 15236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of an odds-ratio test in a stratified group sequential trial with a binary outcome measure.
    Srivastava DK; Rai SN; Pan J
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):351-64. PubMed ID: 17623341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of methods for the construction of confidence interval for relative risk in stratified matched-pair designs.
    Tang NS; Li HQ; Tang ML
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19856277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.