These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints. Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: experts can do a lot with a little. Thompson MB; Tangen JM PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114759. PubMed ID: 25517509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination. Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts. Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The nature of expertise in fingerprint examiners. Busey TA; Parada FJ Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20382913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of fingerprint expertise on visual short-term memory. Corbett BJ; Tangen JM; Searston RA; Thompson MB Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):14. PubMed ID: 38502299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions? Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. Dror I; Rosenthal R J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report. Champod C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts. Busey TA; Vanderkolk JR Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):431-48. PubMed ID: 15610748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence. Mitchell G; Garrett BL Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners. Growns B; Towler A; Dunn JD; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Dror IE Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 35841470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class. Searston RA; Tangen JM PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178403. PubMed ID: 28574998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive science and the law. Busey TA; Loftus GR Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments. Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]