These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23786258)

  • 21. Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110347. PubMed ID: 32512413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The testimony of forensic identification science: what expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.
    McQuiston-Surrett D; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):436-53. PubMed ID: 19259800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.
    Edmond G
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 23036862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts.
    Martire KA; Growns B; Navarro DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2346-2355. PubMed ID: 29667124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis.
    Tangen JM; Kent KM; Searston RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 32430615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Social science research and experimentation in Australian criminal proceedings: prejudicial pre-trial publicity and psychological research.
    Freckelton I; McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2002 Feb; 9(3):347-67. PubMed ID: 12194463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination.
    Crozier WE; Kukucka J; Garrett BL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110433. PubMed ID: 32763747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
    Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forensic identification science evidence since Daubert: Part I--A quantitative analysis of the exclusion of forensic identification science evidence.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1180-4. PubMed ID: 21884119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are forensic scientists too risk averse?
    Mannering WM; Vogelsang MD; Busey TA; Mannering FL
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1377-1400. PubMed ID: 33748945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification.
    Vokey JR; Tangen JM; Cole SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):1023-40. PubMed ID: 19034812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
    Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The vision in "blind" justice: expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition.
    Dror IE; Cole SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Apr; 17(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 20382914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.