These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23786385)

  • 1. Sphero-cylindrical error for oblique gaze as a function of the position of the centre of rotation of the eye.
    Perches S; Ares J; Collados V; Palos F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):456-66. PubMed ID: 23786385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential higher-order aberration cues for sphero-cylindrical refractive error development.
    Buehren T; Iskander DR; Collins MJ; Davis B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 17435529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics.
    Cheng X; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):310-21. PubMed ID: 15134478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AcrySof cachet phakic intraocular lens in myopic patients: visual performance, wavefront error, and lens position.
    Mastropasqua L; Toto L; Vecchiarino L; Doronzo E; Mastropasqua R; Di Nicola M
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 28(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 22386372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance.
    Marsack JD; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
    J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 15134479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Through-focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations.
    Plainis S; Ntzilepis G; Atchison DA; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23199097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual function after correction of distance refractive error with ready-made and custom spectacles: a randomized clinical trial.
    Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Gandhi M; Friedman DS; Keay L
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):2014-20. PubMed ID: 22705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus.
    Marsack JD; Parker KE; Pesudovs K; Donnelly WJ; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 17568315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Through-focus optical characteristics of monofocal and bifocal soft contact lenses across the peripheral visual field.
    Ji Q; Yoo YS; Alam H; Yoon G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 29691930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual performance after overnight orthokeratology.
    Johnson KL; Carney LG; Mountford JA; Collins MJ; Cluff S; Collins PK
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 17215162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual acuity and "balanced progressive" simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Sanders E; Wagner H; Reich LN
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Sep; 34(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 18779670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of in-air and in-saline focimeter measurement of the back vertex power of spherical soft contact lenses.
    Pearson RM; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 22958210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
    Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual acuity and ocular aberrations with different rigid gas permeable lens fittings in keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jul; 36(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 20543704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations.
    Kasper T; Bühren J; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2022-9. PubMed ID: 17137978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective refraction from monochromatic wavefront aberrations via Zernike power polynomials.
    Robert Iskander D; Davis BA; Collins MJ; Franklin R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 17470237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of spherical aberration on visual acuity at different contrasts.
    Li J; Xiong Y; Wang N; Li S; Dai Y; Xue L; Zhao H; Jiang W; Zhang Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1389-95. PubMed ID: 19631126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low- to moderate-astigmatic eyes.
    Richdale K; Berntsen DA; Mack CJ; Merchea MM; Barr JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):969-75. PubMed ID: 18049362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.