These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23786611)

  • 1. Impact of quantity of resin, C-factor, and geometry on resin composite polymerization shrinkage stress in Class V restorations.
    Borges AL; Borges AB; Xavier TA; Bottino MC; Platt JA
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 23786611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
    Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of cavity design on the biomechanics of direct composite resin restorations in Class IV preparations.
    Xu H; Jiang Z; Xiao X; Fu J; Su Q
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2012 Apr; 120(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22409223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.
    Kantardzić I; Vasiljević D; Blazić L; Luzanin O
    Croat Med J; 2012 Dec; 53(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 23275322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cavosurface angle on the stress concentration and gaps formation in class V resin composite restorations.
    Correia AMO; Pereira VEM; Bresciani E; Platt JA; Borges ALS; Caneppele TMF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():272-277. PubMed ID: 31136923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of stresses during the polymerization shrinkage of self-curing resin cement in indirect restorations: a finite-element study.
    Cornacchia TM; Silva GC; Magalhaes CS; Moreira AN; Las Casas EB
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):755-7. PubMed ID: 25728108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I 'restorations' after shrinkage.
    Rodrigues FP; Silikas N; Watts DC; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22036589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Canabarro S; Lopes GC; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 14531591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
    Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for class V light-cured composite restorations.
    Winkler MM; Katona TR; Paydar NH
    J Dent Res; 1996 Jul; 75(7):1477-83. PubMed ID: 8876599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of load cycling on the microleakage of beveled and nonbeveled margins in class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Ameri H; Ghavamnasiri M; Abdoli E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct; 11(5):025-32. PubMed ID: 20978721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Gordan VV
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 11323864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.