524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23787192)
1. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Khlef HN; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Heshmeh O; Youssef N; Mahaini L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):e111-e120. PubMed ID: 33158633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
Tunçer NI; Arman-Özçirpici A; Oduncuoglu BF; Göçmen JS; Kantarci A
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Nov; 39(6):586-594. PubMed ID: 28402521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion.
Liu YH; Ding WH; Liu J; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Sep; 36(9):687-95. PubMed ID: 19602104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Adult Patients with Maxillary or Bimaxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Khlef HN; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Heshmeh O
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jan; 20(1):113-127. PubMed ID: 31058623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-implants for retraction, intrusion and protraction in a Class II division 1 patient.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S
J Orthod; 2007 Sep; 34(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 17761798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss.
Heo W; Nahm DS; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):973-8. PubMed ID: 18004930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. En-masse retraction dependent on a temporary skeletal anchorage device without posterior bonding or banding in an adult with severe bidentoalveolar protrusion: seven years posttreatment.
Chung KR; Jeong DM; Kim SH; Ko YI; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):484-94. PubMed ID: 22464531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Using Two-Step Retraction With Transpalatal Arches Versus En-Masse Retraction With Mini-implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mousa MM; Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33524. PubMed ID: 36636520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mass retraction movement of the anterior upper teeth using orthodontic mini-implants as anchorage.
de Lima Araújo LH; Zenóbio EG; Pacheco W; Cosso MG; Manzi FR; Shibli JA
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 16(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 21274732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
