These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23787267)

  • 1. Neurological registry quality control and quality assurance.
    Marriott J; Noonan VK; Donner E; Lowerison M; Lam D; Day L; Warner J; Smith EE; Mah JK; de Robles P; Jette N; Johnston M; Pringsheim T; Korngut L
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S47-50. PubMed ID: 23787267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation and interpretation of neurological registry data.
    Pringsheim T; Lam D; Day L; Genge A; Hogan DB; Shevell M; Fortin CM; Maxwell C; Fiebelkorn G; Barlow K; Kapral MK; Casha S; Mobach T; Johnston M; Jette N; Korngut L
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S51-3. PubMed ID: 23787269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurological registry feasibility and sustainability.
    Pringsheim T; Marrie RA; Donner E; Shevell M; Lam D; Day L; Johnston M; Jette N; Korngut L
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S55-9. PubMed ID: 23787270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of neurological patient registries.
    Mah JK; Warner J; Hall R; Smith EE; Steeves T; Donner E; Marriott J; Johnston M; Lowerison M; de Robles P; Noonan VK; Mehina E; Jette N; Pringsheim T; Korngut L
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S60-1. PubMed ID: 23787271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common data elements for neurological registries.
    Warner J; Johnston M; Korngut L; Jette N; Pringsheim T
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S62-3. PubMed ID: 23787272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QUALITY ASSURANCE OF REGISTRIES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Mandeville KL; Valentic M; Ivankovic D; Pristas I; Long J; Patrick HE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(4):360-367. PubMed ID: 30251946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What lessons can be learned for cancer registration quality assurance from data users? Skin cancer as an example.
    Maudsley G; Williams EM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 28(5):809-15. PubMed ID: 10597975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical and legal considerations for Canadian registries.
    Hogan DB; Warner J; Patten S; Godlovitch G; Mehina E; Dagenais L; Fiebelkorn G; de Robles P; Mackean G; Casselman L; Jette N; Pringsheim T; Korngut L; Johnston M
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S5-22. PubMed ID: 23787268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurological registry data collection methods and configuration.
    Smith EE; Warner J; Johnston M; Atwood K; Hall R; Mah JK; Maxwell C; Fortin CM; Lowerison M; Kapral MK; Noonan VK; Pfister T; Mackean G; Casselman L; Pringsheim T; Jette N; Korngut L
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S27-31. PubMed ID: 23787263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linkage between neurological registry data and administrative data.
    Jette N; Atwood K; Hamilton M; Hayward R; Day L; Mobach T; Maxwell C; Fortin CM; Fiebelkorn G; Barlow K; Shevell M; Kapral MK; Casha S; Johnston M; Wiebe S; Korngut L; Pringsheim T
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S32-4. PubMed ID: 23787264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The national health care registry had not found its form. Scrutiny shows the value for quality control].
    Garpenby P; Carlsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Jun; 91(25):2509-11. PubMed ID: 8046964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Completeness of invasive cervical cancer at the Cancer Registry of Norway.
    Bilet EF; Langseth H; Thoresen SØ; Bray F
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(7):1070-3. PubMed ID: 19353339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
    Bray F; Parkin DM
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validate more! Common interest in quality assurance of Swedish health data registries].
    Ljung R; Ludvigsson JF; Mattsson F; Lagergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Oct 17-23; 109(42):1872-3. PubMed ID: 23193932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Work flow of registry in participating facilities and data audit in clinical database].
    Tomotaki A; Miyata H; Okubo S; Motomura N; Murakami A; Ono M; Iwanaka T
    Kyobu Geka; 2013 Aug; 66(9):827-32. PubMed ID: 23917237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The National Patient Registry as a clinical quality database].
    Kjaergaard J; Jørgensen T
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(46):5406; author reply 5406-7. PubMed ID: 12469393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Renal replacement therapy registries--time for a structured data quality evaluation programme.
    Couchoud C; Lassalle M; Cornet R; Jager KJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2215-20. PubMed ID: 23386707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [National registries have no quality guarantee. The data used should be from an unidentified material from the counties].
    Lindman A; Eliasson M; Skoglund C
    Lakartidningen; 1997 Mar; 94(10):871-3, 875-6. PubMed ID: 9102517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online neurological registries.
    Johnston M; Campbell C; Godlovitch G; Day L; Wysocki J; Dagenais L; Jette N; Korngut L; Pringsheim T; Marrie RA
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jul; 40(4 Suppl 2):S41-5. PubMed ID: 23787266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approaches to quality control with an application to a new cancer registry in a developing country.
    Kuntoro ; LaPorte RE; Mazumdar S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Jul; 47(7):779-86. PubMed ID: 7722591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.