These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23788628)

  • 1. Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care.
    Bauer NS; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 23788628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.
    Grout RW; Cheng ER; Carroll AE; Bauer NS; Downs SM
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():74-81. PubMed ID: 29500025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.
    van Engen-Verheul MM; Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Peek N; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():15-26. PubMed ID: 26806708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinician Perceptions of a Computerized Decision Support System for Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Screening.
    El Mikati HK; Yazel-Smith L; Grout RW; Downs SM; Carroll AE; Hannon TS
    Appl Clin Inform; 2020 Mar; 11(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 32403140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience with decision support system and comfort with topic predict clinicians' responses to alerts and reminders.
    Bauer NS; Carroll AE; Saha C; Downs SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e125-30. PubMed ID: 26567326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric decision support using adapted Arden Syntax.
    Anand V; Carroll AE; Biondich PG; Dugan TM; Downs SM
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():15-23. PubMed ID: 26547523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.
    Weber S
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2007 Dec; 19(12):652-67. PubMed ID: 18042131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated primary care screening in pediatric waiting rooms.
    Anand V; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):e1275-81. PubMed ID: 22508925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic decision support needs in pediatric primary care.
    Pennington JW; Karavite DJ; Krause EM; Miller J; Bernhardt BA; Grundmeier RW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Jul; 24(4):851-856. PubMed ID: 28339689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study.
    McGinn CA; Gagnon MP; Shaw N; Sicotte C; Mathieu L; Leduc Y; Grenier S; Duplantie J; Abdeljelil AB; Légaré F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Sep; 12():105. PubMed ID: 22967231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof.
    O'Connell RT; Cho C; Shah N; Brown K; Shiffman RN
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14527978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Support Intervention on Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Downs SM; Bauer NS; Saha C; Ofner S; Carroll AE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1917676. PubMed ID: 31851348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. User-oriented evaluation of a medical image retrieval system for radiologists.
    Markonis D; Holzer M; Baroz F; De Castaneda RL; Boyer C; Langs G; Müller H
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):774-83. PubMed ID: 26163487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replacing an inpatient electronic medical record. Lessons learned from user satisfaction with the former system.
    Sicotte C; Paré G; Moreault MP; Lemay A; Valiquette L; Barkun J
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 19151889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Checking the potential shift to perceived usefulness-The analysis of users' response to the updated electronic health record core features.
    Rajković P; Aleksić D; Janković D; Milenković A; Petković I
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jul; 115():80-91. PubMed ID: 29779723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User satisfaction with a real-time automated feedback system for general practitioners: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Bindels R; Hasman A; Derickx M; Van Wersch JW; Winkens RA
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Dec; 15(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 14660533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond the focus group: understanding physicians' barriers to electronic medical records.
    Yan H; Gardner R; Baier R
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2012 Apr; 38(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 22533131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Users' attitudes to an electronic medical record system and its correlates: a multivariate analysis.
    Al-Azmi SF; Al-Enezi N; Chowdhury RI
    Health Inf Manag; 2009; 38(2):33-40. PubMed ID: 19546486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targeted screening for pediatric conditions with the CHICA system.
    Carroll AE; Biondich PG; Anand V; Dugan TM; Sheley ME; Xu SZ; Downs SM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 21672910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.