BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23788721)

  • 21. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: To what extent do we justify it?-Our belief.
    Thomakos N; Trachana SP; Davidovic-Grigoraki M; Rodolakis A
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):495-8. PubMed ID: 27590369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preoperative pathologic findings associated with residual disease at radical hysterectomy in women with stage IA2 cervical cancer.
    Suri A; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; dos Reis R; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 18952270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The value of MR imaging when the site of uterine cancer origin is uncertain.
    Vargas HA; Akin O; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Soslow R; Abu-Rustum N; Barakat RR; Hricak H
    Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 21212371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy?
    Smith AL; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; dos Reis R; Nick AM; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 20708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Survival Rate and Surgical Morbidity of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Li X; Li J; Wen H; Ju X; Chen X; Xia L; Ke G; Tang J; Wu X
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2953-8. PubMed ID: 27044448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advances in fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer.
    Rob L; Pluta M; Skapa P; Robova H
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Jul; 10(7):1101-14. PubMed ID: 20645699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience.
    Peppercorn PD; Jeyarajah AR; Woolas R; Shepherd JH; Oram DH; Jacobs IJ; Armstrong P; Lowe D; Reznek RH
    Radiology; 1999 Aug; 212(2):395-9. PubMed ID: 10429696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multicenter research on tumor and pregnancy outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after fertility-sparing surgery.
    Wang A; Cui G; Jin C; Wang Y; Tian X
    J Int Med Res; 2019 Jul; 47(7):2881-2889. PubMed ID: 31115262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter clinicopathologic study.
    Kim HS; Choi CH; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Kim YB; Kim MA; Kim TJ; Park SY; Kim BG; Song YS; Bae DS; Kim JW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1973-9. PubMed ID: 22183162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient-tailored conservative surgical treatment of invasive uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma. A review.
    Menczer J
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Aug; 65(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24051940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer.
    Robova H; Halaska MJ; Pluta M; Skapa P; Matecha J; Lisy J; Rob L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):213-6. PubMed ID: 25159484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The validity of the subsequent pregnancy index score for fertility-sparing trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Iwata T; Machida H; Matsuo K; Okugawa K; Saito T; Tanaka K; Morishige K; Kobayashi H; Yoshino K; Tokunaga H; Ikeda T; Shozu M; Yaegashi N; Enomoto T; Mikami M
    Fertil Steril; 2021 May; 115(5):1250-1258. PubMed ID: 33589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?
    Plante M; Renaud MC; Sebastianelli A; Gregoire J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):981-986. PubMed ID: 32499393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Search for conditions to avoid parametrectomy during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Ito F; Sugiura A; Toyoda S; Itani Y; Iwai K; Yamada Y; Tanase Y; Kawaguchi R; Kobayashi H; Kita T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 31106933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
    Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.