These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23789574)

  • 1. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
    Kumar R; Pal P
    Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Membrane-integrated hybrid system for the effective treatment of ammoniacal wastewater of coke-making plant: a volume reduction approach.
    Kumar R; Pal P
    Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):2018-27. PubMed ID: 24956796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Membrane-integrated physico-chemical treatment of coke-oven wastewater: transport modelling and economic evaluation.
    Kumar R; Chakrabortty S; Pal P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6010-23. PubMed ID: 25380632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
    Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterisation and application of a novel positively charged nanofiltration membrane for the treatment of textile industry wastewaters.
    Cheng S; Oatley DL; Williams PM; Wright CJ
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 22078250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics and application of ceramic nanofiltration membranes.
    Weber R; Chmiel H; Mavrov V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Mar; 984():178-93. PubMed ID: 12783817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated process for wet scrubber wastewater treatment using electrooxidation and pressure-driven membrane filtration.
    Belibagli P; Isik Z; Özdemir S; Gonca S; Dizge N; Awasthi MK; Balakrishnan D
    Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 2):136216. PubMed ID: 36075362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
    Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of clindamycin from fermentation wastewater with nanofiltration membranes.
    Zhu A; Zhu W; Wu Z; Jing Y
    Water Res; 2003 Sep; 37(15):3718-32. PubMed ID: 12867340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
    Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced oxidation processes with coke plant wastewater treatment.
    Krzywicka A; Kwarciak-Kozłowska A
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(9):1875-8. PubMed ID: 24804662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phosphorus removal using nanofiltration membranes.
    Leo CP; Chai WK; Mohammad AW; Qi Y; Hoedley AF; Chai SP
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 22053475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-treatment of coking industry wastewater by the electro-Fenton process.
    Güçlü D; Sahinkaya S; Sirin N
    Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23789568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.