These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23790677)

  • 41. The influence of body mass index on outcome of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.
    Zheng W; Chen S; Song J; Liu J; Fan C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 May; 26(5):809-814. PubMed ID: 28162879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative evaluation of the measurement properties of various shoulder outcome instruments.
    Oh JH; Jo KH; Kim WS; Gong HS; Han SG; Kim YH
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jun; 37(6):1161-8. PubMed ID: 19403837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy and reliability of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.
    Cusick MC; Bonnaig NS; Azar FM; Mauck BM; Smith RA; Throckmorton TW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1146-50. PubMed ID: 24656392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes.
    Drake BG; Callahan CM; Dittus RS; Wright JG
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 7964773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties.
    Terwee CB; Bouwmeester W; van Elsland SL; de Vet HC; Dekker J
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2011 Jun; 19(6):620-33. PubMed ID: 21251989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery.
    Dawson J; Doll H; Boller I; Fitzpatrick R; Little C; Rees J; Jenkinson C; Carr AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 18378921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measurement properties of gait-related outcomes in youth with neuromuscular diagnoses: a systematic review.
    Ammann-Reiffer C; Bastiaenen CH; de Bie RA; van Hedel HJ
    Phys Ther; 2014 Aug; 94(8):1067-82. PubMed ID: 24786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of sexual difficulties associated with multi-modal treatment for cervical or endometrial cancer: A systematic review of measurement instruments.
    White ID; Sangha A; Lucas G; Wiseman T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Dec; 143(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 27671030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease.
    Huang H; Grant JA; Miller BS; Mirza FM; Gagnier JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2572-82. PubMed ID: 25622986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Release of the stiff elbow with mini-open technique.
    Kruse KK; Papatheodorou LK; Weiser RW; Sotereanos DG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Mar; 25(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 26927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Elbow arthroscopy.
    Tedder JL; Andrews JR
    Orthop Rev; 1992 Sep; 21(9):1047-53. PubMed ID: 1437255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Measurement properties of existing clinical assessment methods evaluating scapular positioning and function. A systematic review.
    Larsen CM; Juul-Kristensen B; Lund H; Søgaard K
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2014 Oct; 30(7):453-82. PubMed ID: 24678755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ulnar neuritis after open elbow arthrolysis combined with ulnar nerve subcutaneous transposition for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: outcome and risk factors.
    Cai J; Zhou Y; Chen S; Sun Y; Yuanming O; Ruan H; Fan C
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1027-33. PubMed ID: 27039670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review.
    Poitras I; Dupuis F; Bielmann M; Campeau-Lecours A; Mercier C; Bouyer LJ; Roy JS
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30935116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Patient-reported outcomes: Which ones are most relevant?
    Van Lieshout EMM; Wijffels MME
    Injury; 2020 May; 51 Suppl 2():S37-S42. PubMed ID: 31708093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Outcome Measures to Evaluate Upper and Lower Extremity: Which Scores are Valid?
    Darwich A; Schüttler V; Obertacke U; Jawhar A
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2020 Feb; 158(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 31250413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review.
    Zywiel MG; Mahomed A; Gandhi R; Perruccio AV; Mahomed NN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3446-56. PubMed ID: 23633186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Development and validation of the elbow demand rating scale.
    Nissen CW; O'Hara EA; McCarthy M; Kostyun R
    Sports Health; 2013 Jul; 5(4):360-2. PubMed ID: 24459555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessing construct structural validity of epidemiological measurement tools: a seven-step roadmap.
    Reichenheim ME; Hökerberg YH; Moraes CL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2014 May; 30(5):927-39. PubMed ID: 24936810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is medical informatics a mature science? A review of measurement practice in outcome studies of clinical systems.
    Friedman CP; Abbas UL
    Int J Med Inform; 2003 Mar; 69(2-3):261-72. PubMed ID: 12810129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.