BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23790725)

  • 1. Multiple imputation of missing values was not necessary before performing a longitudinal mixed-model analysis.
    Twisk J; de Boer M; de Vente W; Heymans M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1022-8. PubMed ID: 23790725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Missing data in longitudinal studies: cross-sectional multiple imputation provides similar estimates to full-information maximum likelihood.
    Ferro MA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 24210708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for multiple imputations in repeated measurements with time-dependent covariates: a case study.
    Tan FES; Jolani S; Verbeek H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():107-114. PubMed ID: 29964148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of an incomplete longitudinal composite variable using a marginalized random effects model and multiple imputation.
    Gosho M; Maruo K; Ishii R; Hirakawa A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):2200-2215. PubMed ID: 27856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data.
    Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM
    Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
    Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A wide range of missing imputation approaches in longitudinal data: a simulation study and real data analysis.
    Jahangiri M; Kazemnejad A; Goldfeld KS; Daneshpour MS; Mostafaei S; Khalili D; Moghadas MR; Akbarzadeh M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 37415114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cumulative sojourn time in longitudinal studies: a sequential imputation method to handle missing health state data due to dropout.
    Li X; Liu J; Duan N; Jiang H; Girgis R; Lieberman J
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2030-47. PubMed ID: 24918241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dealing with missing covariates in epidemiologic studies: a comparison between multiple imputation and a full Bayesian approach.
    Erler NS; Rizopoulos D; Rosmalen Jv; Jaddoe VW; Franco OH; Lesaffre EM
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(17):2955-74. PubMed ID: 27042954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values.
    Donders AR; van der Heijden GJ; Stijnen T; Moons KG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1087-91. PubMed ID: 16980149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical results in longitudinal studies depended on target of inference and assumed mechanism of attrition.
    Jones M; Mishra GD; Dobson A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1165-75. PubMed ID: 25920943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes.
    Wood AM; White IR; Hillsdon M; Carpenter J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 15333619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Number of imputations needed to stabilize estimated treatment difference in longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):674-690. PubMed ID: 25305196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attrition in longitudinal studies. How to deal with missing data.
    Twisk J; de Vente W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 55(4):329-37. PubMed ID: 11927199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonlinear multiple imputation for continuous covariate within semiparametric Cox model: application to HIV data in Senegal.
    Mbougua JB; Laurent C; Ndoye I; Delaporte E; Gwet H; Molinari N
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4651-65. PubMed ID: 23712767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation methods for handling incomplete longitudinal and clustered data where the target analysis is a linear mixed effects model.
    Huque MH; Moreno-Betancur M; Quartagno M; Simpson JA; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):444-466. PubMed ID: 31919921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.