These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23790726)

  • 1. Absolute risks rather than incidence rates should be used to estimate the number needed to treat from time-to-event data.
    Bender R; Kromp M; Kiefer C; Sturtz S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1038-44. PubMed ID: 23790726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal.
    Mendes D; Alves C; Batel-Marques F
    BMC Med; 2017 Jun; 15(1):112. PubMed ID: 28571585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of numbers needed to treat should be based on absolute risks.
    Bender R; Kromp M; Kiefer C; Sturtz S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):238-9. PubMed ID: 24183605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Number needed to treat is incorrect without proper time-related considerations.
    Suissa D; Brassard P; Smiechowski B; Suissa S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21816576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating adjusted NNTs in randomised controlled trials with binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Bender R; Vervölgyi V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 20624484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Number needed to treat from absolute risk and incidence rate: how to make apples and oranges comparable?
    Girerd N; Rabilloud M; Duarte K; Roy P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 24210846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Number needed to treat: Interpretation and estimation in multivariable analyses and censored data].
    Gómez-Acebo I; Dierssen-Sotos T; Llorca J
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 May; 142(10):451-6. PubMed ID: 23850150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Logistic regression was preferred to estimate risk differences and numbers needed to be exposed adjusted for covariates.
    Gehrmann U; Kuss O; Wellmann J; Bender R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1223-31. PubMed ID: 20430578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note on estimating treatment effect for time-to-event data in a literature-based meta-analysis.
    Hirooka T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 19283306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error.
    Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Strategies for Modeling Competing Risks in Discrete-Event Simulations: A Simulation Study and Illustration in Colorectal Cancer.
    Degeling K; Koffijberg H; Franken MD; Koopman M; IJzerman MJ
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Jan; 39(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 30799693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Common problems related to the use of number needed to treat.
    Stang A; Poole C; Bender R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 19880287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies.
    Parast L; Griffin BA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):161-182. PubMed ID: 26880366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative approach for estimating the number needed to treat for survival endpoints.
    Yang Z; Yin G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223301. PubMed ID: 31626655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.
    Mayne TJ; Whalen E; Vu A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 16488351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust methods to improve efficiency and reduce bias in estimating survival curves in randomized clinical trials.
    Zhang M
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Jan; 21(1):119-37. PubMed ID: 24522498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unusually large numbers needed to treat for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients with PSA velocity ≤2 ng/ml/year.
    Scheerer J; Kahabka P; Altwein JE; Weißbach L
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22814092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.