330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23790783)
1. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in uterine pathology.
Saceanu SM; Cela V; Pluchino N; Angelescu C; Surlin V; Genazzani A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):340-2. PubMed ID: 23578812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When is laparotomy needed in hysterectomy for benign uterine disease?
Canis M; Botchorishvili R; Ang C; Rabischong B; Jardon K; Wattiez A; Mage G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18262142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy. A series of 318 consecutive cases].
Masson FN; Pouly JL; Canis M; Mage G; Wattiez A; Pomel C; Glowaczover E; Bruhat MA
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(4):340-52. PubMed ID: 8815132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Poor vaginal access: excellent indication for laparoscopic hysterectomy].
Chapron C; Dubuisson JB; Ansquer Y; Fernandez B
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(8):789-97. PubMed ID: 9509319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Total hysterectomy for benign pathologies: why is laparoscopy of value?].
Chapron C; Aubert V; Dubuisson JB
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1995 Nov; 23(11):688-93. PubMed ID: 8520652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
