879 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23791546)
1. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients values in the prostate: comparison among normal tissue, prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis.
Liu X; Peng W; Zhou L; Wang H
Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(2):222-32. PubMed ID: 23483254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Oto A; Kayhan A; Jiang Y; Tretiakova M; Yang C; Antic T; Dahi F; Shalhav AL; Karczmar G; Stadler WM
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 20843992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-tensor MRI at 3 T: differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Ha SY; Kwon GY; Kim B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W254-62. PubMed ID: 24555622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of prostate cancer and stromal hyperplasia in the transition zone with histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Xiaohang L; Bingni Z; Liangping Z; Weijun P; Xiaoqun Y; Yong Z
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1528-1534. PubMed ID: 28286980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Shen L; Zhou L; Liu X; Yang X
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2017; 23(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 28050950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of stretched-Exponential and monoexponential model diffusion-Weighted imaging in prostate cancer and normal tissues.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang H; Zhang Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1078-85. PubMed ID: 25727776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient calculation between two-point and multipoint B value analyses in prostate cancer and benign prostate tissue at 3 T: preliminary experience.
Park SY; Kim CK; Park BK; Kwon GY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W287-94. PubMed ID: 25148186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).
Kitajima K; Takahashi S; Ueno Y; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Obara M; Miyake H; Fujisawa M; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient: prostate cancer versus noncancerous tissue according to anatomical region.
Kim JH; Kim JK; Park BW; Kim N; Cho KS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 18837000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer.
Shinmoto H; Tamura C; Soga S; Shiomi E; Yoshihara N; Kaji T; Mulkern RV
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):W496-500. PubMed ID: 22997399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Mutlu H; Sivrioglu AK; Sonmez G; Velioglu M; Sildiroglu HO; Basekim CC; Kizilkaya E
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22226435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range.
Mulkern RV; Barnes AS; Haker SJ; Hung YP; Rybicki FJ; Maier SE; Tempany CM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jun; 24(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 16735177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis.
Wetter A; Nensa F; Lipponer C; Guberina N; Olbricht T; Schenck M; Schlosser TW; Gratz M; Lauenstein TC
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1009-15. PubMed ID: 25168023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer.
Shinmoto H; Oshio K; Tanimoto A; Higuchi N; Okuda S; Kuribayashi S; Mulkern RV
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):355-9. PubMed ID: 18768281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
