These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23792216)

  • 1. Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):390-8. PubMed ID: 23792216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1295-309. PubMed ID: 25453608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback processing in adolescence: an event-related potential study of age and gender differences.
    Grose-Fifer J; Migliaccio R; Zottoli TM
    Dev Neurosci; 2014; 36(3-4):228-38. PubMed ID: 24853058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telling good from bad news: ADHD differentially affects processing of positive and negative feedback during guessing.
    van Meel CS; Oosterlaan J; Heslenfeld DJ; Sergeant JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1946-54. PubMed ID: 15878183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task.
    San Martín R; Manes F; Hurtado E; Isla P; Ibañez A
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(3):1194-204. PubMed ID: 20302950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.
    Oberg SA; Christie GJ; Tata MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3768-75. PubMed ID: 21982697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You do the math: coding of bets and outcomes in a gambling task in the feedback-related negativity and p300 in healthy adults.
    Peterburs J; Suchan B; Bellebaum C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81262. PubMed ID: 24282577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological correlates of near outcome and outcome sequence processing in problem gamblers and controls.
    Ulrich N; Hewig J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):379-392. PubMed ID: 29111453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in adolescents.
    Zottoli TM; Grose-Fifer J
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Mar; 49(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 22091835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A miss is as good as a mile? Processing of near and full outcomes in a gambling paradigm.
    Ulrich N; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):819-23. PubMed ID: 24806789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problem gamblers are hyposensitive to wins: an analysis of skin conductance responses during actual gambling on electronic gaming machines.
    Lole L; Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; Blaszczynski A
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Jun; 51(6):556-64. PubMed ID: 24588340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right frontal cortex generates reward-related theta-band oscillatory activity.
    Christie GJ; Tata MS
    Neuroimage; 2009 Nov; 48(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 19591949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes.
    Hajcak G; Moser JS; Holroyd CB; Simons RF
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 16005561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How bad was it? Differences in the time course of sensitivity to the magnitude of loss in problem gamblers and controls.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Jun; 247():140-5. PubMed ID: 23538067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The near-miss effect in slot-machine gambling: modulation of feedback-related negativity by subjective value.
    Luo Q; Wang Y; Qu C
    Neuroreport; 2011 Dec; 22(18):989-93. PubMed ID: 22045258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity.
    Kreussel L; Hewig J; Kretschmer N; Hecht H; Coles MG; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 22091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline EEG theta/beta ratio and punishment sensitivity as biomarkers for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and risk-taking.
    Massar SA; Rossi V; Schutter DJ; Kenemans JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 123(10):1958-65. PubMed ID: 22542439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback and reward processing in high-functioning autism.
    Larson MJ; South M; Krauskopf E; Clawson A; Crowley MJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):198-203. PubMed ID: 21122921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.