These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23792340)

  • 21. Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort.
    Bronselaer GA; Schober JM; Meyer-Bahlburg HF; T'Sjoen G; Vlietinck R; Hoebeke PB
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 23374102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
    Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions in Normal Men Complaining of Small Penis Size.
    Marra G; Drury A; Tran L; Veale D; Muir GH
    Sex Med Rev; 2020 Jan; 8(1):158-180. PubMed ID: 31027932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reconstruction of deformities resulting from penile enlargement surgery.
    Alter GJ
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 9366334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A preliminary study of the sensory distribution of the penile dorsal and ventral nerves: implications for effective penile block for circumcision.
    Long RM; McCartan D; Cullen I; Harmon D; Flood HD
    BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(11):1576-8. PubMed ID: 19889061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures.
    Mondaini N; Ponchietti R; Gontero P; Muir GH; Natali A; Caldarera E; Biscioni S; Rizzo M
    Int J Impot Res; 2002 Aug; 14(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 12152118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision.
    Cuckow PM; Rix G; Mouriquand PD
    J Pediatr Surg; 1994 Apr; 29(4):561-3. PubMed ID: 8014816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical solutions for the complications of the Vaseline self-injection of the penis.
    Bajory Z; Mohos G; Rosecker A; Bordás N; Pajor L
    J Sex Med; 2013 Apr; 10(4):1170-7. PubMed ID: 23347284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
    Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
    Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New surgical technique for ventral penile curvature without circumcision.
    Alei G; Letizia P; Alei L; Massoni F; Ricci S
    BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 25035866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Circumcision versus the foreskin-deglove plus shaft-fix procedure for phimosis or redundant prepuce in obese adult patients].
    Chen XY; Wen XF; Li RB; Zhou L; Sun X; Wang YM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Mar; 22(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 27172663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision.
    Ozen V; Yigit D
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Feb; 16(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 31759904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bipolar circumcision: A new technique for an old procedure with quantified cosmetic outcome.
    El-Mefleh N; Kaddah M; Ba'Ath ME
    Afr J Paediatr Surg; 2021; 18(4):187-189. PubMed ID: 34341300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Motivations and Psychological Characteristics of Men Seeking Penile Girth Augmentation.
    Sharp G; Fernando AN; Kyron M; Oates J; McEvoy P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Oct; 42(11):1305-1315. PubMed ID: 35511228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Augmentation Phalloplasty Patient Selection and Satisfaction Inventory: a novel questionnaire to evaluate patients considered for augmentation phalloplasty surgery because of penile dysmorphophobia.
    Spyropoulos E; Galanakis I; Dellis A
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 17826474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the Impact of Penile Girth Discrepancy on Patient Bother in Men With Peyronie's Disease: An Observational Study.
    Salter CA; Nascimento B; Terrier JE; Taniguchi H; Bernie H; Miranda E; Jenkins L; Schofield E; Mulhall JP
    J Sex Med; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1560-1565. PubMed ID: 32576497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Girth Supersizing on Patient Satisfaction After Semi-Rigid Penile Implant Insertion: A Prospective Case-Control Study.
    Salem AM; Osman IAL; Zaghloul AS; Shokr Mohamed M; Sadek MN; GamalEl Din SF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jun; 39(7):NP259-NP265. PubMed ID: 31220204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study.
    Han H; Xie DW; Zhou XG; Zhang XD
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(4):736-745. PubMed ID: 27819755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Choosing the appropriate ShangRing size for paediatric circumcision using the no-flip technique.
    Fang L; Zhu W; Xie Z; Wu K; Wang G; Yan Z; Zheng Z; Ma Q; Cheng Y
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2018 Jan; 54(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28799669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.